Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ruzic v. Ruzic, 281 N.W.2d 502.

84 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Linda Beth Krelitz v. Michael James Krelitz Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(noting that district court may consider parties’ “earning ability” and capacity to generate income when making distributions under section 518.58); (“[A]n equitable division of marital property is not necessarily an equal division.” (Quotatio
In re the Marriage of: Donald William McIsaac v. Nadine S. Roberts Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Marriage of: Debra Lynn Ober v. Randall Lane Ober Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Jacob Kanake M’mujuri v. Beatrice Kamathi Kanake Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Johns v. 5 Johns, (“A trial court’s division of marital property need not be mathematically equal.”).
In re the Marriage of: Kristin Anne Schmidt v. Jonathan William Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kristin Anne Schmidt v. Jonathan William Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain 615 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Chamberlain v. Chamberlain 615 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
1 (1998) (requiring just and-equitable property division); (concluding court’s division of marital property need not be mathematically equal, but need only be just and equitable).
Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 583 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 583 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Olsen v. Olsen 552 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Olsen v. Olsen 552 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(division of marital property need not be mathematically equal; it need only be just and equitable).
Marriage of Nazar v. Nazar 505 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Nazar v. Nazar 505 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Fastner v. Fastner 427 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Mancuso v. Mancuso 417 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Mancuso v. Mancuso 417 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
However, “[a] trial court’s division of marital property need not be mathematically equal [but] the court must make a just and equitable division of the marital property of the parties.” (); Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Driscoll v. Driscoll 414 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Driscoll v. Driscoll 414 N.W.2d 441 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Dorweiler v. Dorweiler 413 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Dorweiler v. Dorweiler 413 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lynch v. Lynch 411 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tollefson v. Tollefson 403 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Tollefson v. Tollefson 403 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haaland v. Haaland 392 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ziemer v. Ziemer 386 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ziemer v. Ziemer 386 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
§ 518.58 (1984); , 23 *351 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) ().
Vinnes v. Vinnes 384 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Vinnes v. Vinnes 384 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Resch v. Resch 381 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Resch v. Resch 381 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Margeson v. Margeson 376 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Margeson v. Margeson 376 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Meyer v. Meyer 375 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The division need not be mathematically equal, *828 and the court has discretion to award debts to one party only.
Marriage of Sullivan v. Sullivan 374 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Sullivan v. Sullivan 374 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Brockman v. Brockman 373 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Brockman v. Brockman 373 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985