Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Simon, 275 N.W.2d 51.

23 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(determining that evidence showing that the defendant’s bedroom contained a controlled substance, syringe, passport, and balance scale was sufficient to prove constructive possession even though defendant jointly leased the home and his co-tenant may have had access to his room).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d at 601; (recognizing that “[ p]roximity is an important consideration in assessing constructive possession”) (quotation omitted); (c oncluding defendant constructively possessed drugs, found near his passport, located in a bedroom of a shared home).
State of Minnesota v. Maureen Ndidiamaka Onyelobi 879 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Maureen Ndidiamaka Onyelobi 879 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 2016
rugs found in a common area of a shared apartment was properly inferred because the defendant had admitted to possessing other drugs); (concluding sufficient evidence for constructive possession existed where drugs were found, in defendant’s residence, among male clothing as well as papers and a checkbook bearing defendant’s name); (concluding sufficient evidence for constructive possession existed where drugs were found, in addition to a passport, in the defendant’s bedroom in a jointly leased
State of Minnesota v. Wallace Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wallace Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s finding of constructive possession where controlled substances were 11 found in the defendant’s bedroom); (“The state’s evidence showed that the LSD, along with other items, including a syringe, a passport, and a balance scale, was found in defendant’s bedroom during the execution of a warrant to search the mobile home which defendant jointly leased and occupied with a friend.
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (defendant constructively possessed narcotics found, along with a passport, in his bedroom in a mobile home defendant jointly leased with a friend); State v. Mollberg, 310 Minn. 376, 390, (defendant constructively possessed marijuana found in bedroom along with letters a
State v. Sater 588 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Sater 588 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(when initial conviction is set aside on appeal, section 609.035 does not bar retrial of other charges arising from same conduct); (section 609.035 does not, on dismissal of one charge, bar prosecution of other pending charges arising from same conduct); (section 609.035 does not apply where prosecution has not ended in conviction or acquittal, as where matter is continued bec
State v. Martinez 530 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Martinez 530 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(section 609.035 does not apply where conviction set aside on appeal); (section 609.035 does not apply where charge dismissed before trial); State v. Gaulke, 281 Minn. 327, 329 , (section 609.035 does not apply where case dismissed although jury had been impaneled).
State v. Hernandez 395 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hernandez 395 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See State v. Florine, 303 Minn. 103 , (LSD found in appellant’s bedroom was sufficient to support conviction for possession).
State v. Lorenz 368 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1985
State v. Lorenz 368 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1985
(affirming defendant’s conviction of possessing LSD found in his bedroom in a mobile home he shared with another person).
State v. Wiley 366 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1985
State v. Wiley 366 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1985
(defendant constructively possessed controlled substances found in a bedroom containing male clothing, as well as papers and a checkbook bearing defendant’s name); (defendant constructively possessed narcotics found, along with a passport, in his bedroom in a mobile home defendant jointly leased with a friend); State v. Mollberg, 310 Minn. 376 , (defendant constructively possessed marijuana found in bedroom along with letters addressed to defend
State v. Spaulding 296 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1980
State v. Spaulding 296 N.W.2d 870 Minn. 1980
State v. Gaulke, 281 Minn. 327
State v. Crisler 285 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1979
State v. Crisler 285 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 1979
We have recognized that where the evidence would have been admitted anyway, or where the other evidence against the defendant overwhelmingly points to his guilt, any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.