Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mendoza, 297 N.W.2d 286.

26 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. William Arnold Lindeman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dean Aaron Anderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See, (holding defendan t waived the issue of serial prosecution by not raising it at the district court).
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that appellant does not forfeit the issue of multiple sentencing under Minn. Stat. § 609.035 by failing to raise the issue in the trial court).
State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 105-106
State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(holding defendant waived the issue of serial prosecution but could not forfeit multiple sentencing issue).
State v. Wipper 512 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1994
State v. Wipper 512 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1994
(multiple victim exception does not allow imposition of multiple sentences where defendant committed four burglaries in taking money from coin boxes in laundry rooms in four different apartment buildings that were a part of a single complex owned and operated by same party or entity), (upholding, under multiple victim exception, sentences of defendant for attempted robbery of victim and for assault of officer who tried to question defendant).
State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Serstock 390 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Serstock 390 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Security Bank of Pine Island v. Holst, 298 Minn. 563 , (case will be reviewed in accordance with theory in which it was pleaded and decided).
State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. White, 300 Minn. 99
Langdon v. State 375 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1985
Langdon v. State 375 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1985
Nor could the court-recognized multiple-victim exception, apply here, since the record indicates that all the buildings are part of a single complex owned and operated by the same party or entity.
State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520
State v. McAdoo 330 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1983
State v. McAdoo 330 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1983
State v. Upton 306 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1981
State v. Upton 306 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1981
State v. St. John 299 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980
State v. St. John 299 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980