DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mendoza, 297 N.W.2d 286.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • Dean Aaron Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    See, (holding defendan t waived the issue of serial prosecution by not raising it at the district court).
  • State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    (stating that appellant does not forfeit the issue of multiple sentencing under Minn. Stat. § 609.035 by failing to raise the issue in the trial court).
  • State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 105-106
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Johnson 653 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    (holding defendant waived the issue of serial prosecution but could not forfeit multiple sentencing issue).
  • State v. Wipper 512 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Wipper 512 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1994
    (multiple victim exception does not allow imposition of multiple sentences where defendant committed four burglaries in taking money from coin boxes in laundry rooms in four different apartment buildings that were a part of a single complex owned and operated by same party or entity), (upholding, under multiple victim exception, sentences of defendant for attempted robbery of victim and for assault of officer who tried to question defendant).
  • State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Nordby 448 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Serstock 390 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Serstock 390 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Security Bank of Pine Island v. Holst, 298 Minn. 563 , (case will be reviewed in accordance with theory in which it was pleaded and decided).
  • State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Hodges 384 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. White, 300 Minn. 99
  • Langdon v. State 375 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1985
  • Langdon v. State 375 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1985
    Nor could the court-recognized multiple-victim exception, apply here, since the record indicates that all the buildings are part of a single complex owned and operated by the same party or entity.
  • State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520
  • State v. McAdoo 330 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1983
  • State v. McAdoo 330 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Upton 306 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Upton 306 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1981
  • State v. St. John 299 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980
  • State v. St. John 299 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1980