DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Champion, 319 N.W.2d 21.

224 citing documents.

  • Cobb v. State 325 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1982
  • Osborn v. State 325 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1982
  • Clipper v. State 325 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1982
  • Hanson v. State 325 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1982
  • Djonne v. State 324 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1982
  • Troyer v. State 324 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1982
  • Djonne v. State 324 N.W.2d 925 Minn. 1982
  • Troyer v. State 324 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1982
    we made it clear that a petitioner’s record as a violent offender and his record of recidivism are relevant factors to be considered in determining whether or not to resentence a petitioner according to the Sentencing Guidelines.
  • Buckanaga v. State 324 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1982
  • Bell v. State 325 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1982
  • Weinandt v. State 324 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1982
  • Johnson v. State 324 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1982
  • Pitschneider v. State 324 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1982
  • Brown v. State 324 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1982
  • Pitschneider v. State 324 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner, is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a rec *918 ord suggesting that he is likely to engage in crimi
  • Buckanaga v. State 324 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Bell v. State 325 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Johnson v. State 324 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Weinandt v. State 324 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal co
  • Brown v. State 324 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Ward v. State 324 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1982
  • Ward v. State 324 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postcon-viction court’s refusal to make the finding *650 that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in crimin
  • Meyer v. State 324 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1982
  • Meyer v. State 324 N.W.2d 647 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Rue v. State 324 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1982
  • Johnson v. State 324 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1982
  • Stusek v. State 324 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1982
  • Moss v. State 324 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1982
  • Zernechel v. State 324 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1982
  • Rhinehart v. State 324 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1982
  • Ford v. State 324 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1982
  • Zernechel v. State 324 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Rhinehart v. State 324 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Ford v. State 324 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Stusek v. State 324 N.W.2d 366 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Rue v. State 324 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Johnson v. State 324 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Moss v. State 324 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Bergquist v. State 323 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1982
  • Whelan v. State 323 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1982
  • Whelan v. State 323 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1982
    “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal conduct after his
  • Bergquist v. State 323 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal con
  • Lindstrom v. State 322 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1982
  • Oliver v. State 322 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
  • Wensman v. State 322 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1982
  • Lindstrom v. State 322 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1982
    we stated that “[W]e generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record suggesting that he is likely to engage in criminal c
  • Oliver v. State 322 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1982
    *730 and in numerous other cases, we have made it clear that we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resentencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a history of recidivism.
  • Wensman v. State 322 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1982
    as in other cases, we indicated that we generally will not interfere with the postconviction court’s refusal to make the finding that is prerequisite to resen-tencing, at least in cases in which the petitioner is serving a sentence for a violent offense or has a record of recidivism.
  • Garcia v. State 322 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1982
  • Laube v. State 322 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1982