Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rootes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., 669 N.W.2d 416.
-
Santa Williamson, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., (“Because it is undisputed [employee] voluntarily quit her job, the dispositive issue is whether [employee] quit for good reason caused by [her employer].”).
-
Robert Salvaggio, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1(1) (2024); see Rootes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
-
Jordan M. Kovarik, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Rowan, d at 884 (concluding that adverse action existed when employee lost work and hours); Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., (decreasing wages and changing work schedule constitute adverse action).
-
Cleo K. Clemmer, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“What constitutes good reason caused by the employer is defined exclusively by statute.” Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
-
John Lo, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“What constitutes good reason caused by the employer is defined exclusively by statute.” Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
-
Nancy J. Peterson, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“What constitutes good reason caused by the employer is defined exclusively by statute.” Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
- Michael Sirek, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
Marvin Kimble, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
( harassment of employee based on his sexual orientation and employer’s failure to appropriately act were good reasons to quit); Peppi, d (employer’s refusal to investigate employe e’s sexual -harassment complaint constituted good reason to quit); Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., (impending substantial changes in wages and hours constituted good reason to quit); Munro Holding, LLC v. Cook , (concluding that ongoing sexual harassment by the employer -owner constituted good reason to quit); Rowan
- Michael Noel, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Leslie Bjerke, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Danielson Mobil, (determining a 19% reduction in wages is a “good cause” to quit); Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., (determining that a decrease in hours and wages constituted a good reason to quit); Krantz v. Loxtercamp Transp., Inc., (determining that an employer changing a work er’s schedule and 9 requesting that he work weekends, when the employee was told he wo
- Wajiha Shirin Shah, Relator v. IMI's MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Wajiha Shirin Shah, Relator v. IMI's MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Rootes v. Wal-Mart 10 Assocs.’s, Inc., (“[T]he legislature has unambiguously provided that, absent employee misconduct, an employee may quit for good reason caused by the employer if there was a substantial adverse change in wages, hours or other terms of employment.”).
- Kennedy N. Mogere, Relator v. Minnesota Masonic Home Northridge (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Kennedy N. Mogere, Relator v. Minnesota Masonic Home Northridge (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
- Wendy Bronstad, Relator v. The House of Hope, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Wendy Bronstad, Relator v. The House of Hope, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
- Rowan v. Dream It, Inc. 812 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Rowan v. Dream It, Inc.
812 N.W.2d 879
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
3 “Whether an employee had good cause to quit is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc., review denied (Minn. July 19, 2005); see also Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
- Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc. 696 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc. 696 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005