Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rootes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., 669 N.W.2d 416.

20 citing documents.

Santa Williamson v. Chisholm HRA, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., (“Because it is undisputed [employee] voluntarily quit her job, the dispositive issue is whether [employee] quit for good reason caused by [her employer].”).
Robert Salvaggio v. Prominent Technology, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1(1) (2024); see Rootes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Jordan M. Kovarik v. JP Hospitality Group, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Rowan, d at 884 (concluding that adverse action existed when employee lost work and hours); Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., (decreasing wages and changing work schedule constitute adverse action).
Cleo K. Clemmer v. The Cook Hospital, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“What constitutes good reason caused by the employer is defined exclusively by statute.” Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
John Lo v. Pye-Barker Fire & Safety LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“What constitutes good reason caused by the employer is defined exclusively by statute.” Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
Nancy J. Peterson v. St. Cloud Hospital, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“What constitutes good reason caused by the employer is defined exclusively by statute.” Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
Michael Sirek v. Northwest Respiratory Services, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Marvin Kimble v. Empire Beauty School, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
( harassment of employee based on his sexual orientation and employer’s failure to appropriately act were good reasons to quit); Peppi, d (employer’s refusal to investigate employe e’s sexual -harassment complaint constituted good reason to quit); Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., (impending substantial changes in wages and hours constituted good reason to quit); Munro Holding, LLC v. Cook , (concluding that ongoing sexual harassment by the employer -owner constituted good reason to quit); Rowan
Michael Noel v. Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Leslie Bjerke v. U.S. Postal Service, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Danielson Mobil, (determining a 19% reduction in wages is a “good cause” to quit); Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., (determining that a decrease in hours and wages constituted a good reason to quit); Krantz v. Loxtercamp Transp., Inc., (determining that an employer changing a work er’s schedule and 9 requesting that he work weekends, when the employee was told he wo
Wajiha Shirin Shah v. IMI’s MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Wajiha Shirin Shah v. IMI’s MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Rootes v. Wal-Mart 10 Assocs.’s, Inc., (“[T]he legislature has unambiguously provided that, absent employee misconduct, an employee may quit for good reason caused by the employer if there was a substantial adverse change in wages, hours or other terms of employment.”).
Kennedy N. Mogere v. Minnesota Masonic Home Northridge (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kennedy N. Mogere v. Minnesota Masonic Home Northridge (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
Wendy Bronstad v. The House of Hope, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Wendy Bronstad v. The House of Hope, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
Rowan v. Dream It, Inc. 812 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Rowan v. Dream It, Inc. 812 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
3 “Whether an employee had good cause to quit is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc., review denied (Minn. July 19, 2005); see also Rootes v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.
Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc. 696 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc. 696 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2005