Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources, 693 N.W.2d 181.

47 citing documents.

Jennifer Odegaard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Larry Kenneth Alexander v. Tyson's Towing and Transport LLC, GSIC Southview LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Larry Kenneth Alexander v. Tyson's Towing and Transport LLC, GSIC Southview LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Res., n.1 (Minn. 2005) (listing existence of a duty as an element of a negligence claim).
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Kristie Kollmann, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Robert Sharot, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Ridgewood Bay Resort, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“The moving party has the burden of showing an absence of factual issues before summary judgment can be granted .” Anderson v. State, Dep’ t of Natural Res.
Docks of White Bear Lake, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“Private nuisance is limited to real property interests.”); Highview N. Apartments v. County of Ramsey , (noting that the nuisance statute defines nuisance in terms of a “resultant harm”); Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen’s Club, Inc.
William O. Bradley, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Glacier Park Iron Ore Properties, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Michelle L. MacDonald, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Res., d 181, 191 (Minn. 2005).
Renee Dianne Florek, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-90 (Minn. 2005) (quotations omitted).
Nicholas Johnson and Michelle Johnson, individually and as parents and natural guardians of D.J., a minor, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Peter Christiansen, a minor, by and through his parent and natural guardian, Brad Christiansen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
U. S. Bank National Association, successor by merger to U. S. Bank National Association ND, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Michelle Alton Bonomo, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Laila Jama, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Martin L. Harris v. Lang Nelson Associates, Inc. d/b/a Creekside Gables Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Martin L. Harris v. Lang Nelson Associates, Inc. d/b/a Creekside Gables Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The moving party has the burden of showing an absence of factual issues before summary judgment can be granted.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.
Construction Services, Inc. of Duluth v. Town of Alborn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Construction Services, Inc. of Duluth v. Town of Alborn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
I. Appellant’s breach “The moving party has the burden of showing an absence of factual issues before summary judgment can be granted.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Erik Hjelle, The Insurance Shop Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Erik Hjelle, The Insurance Shop Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The moving party has the burden of showing an absence of factual issues before summary judgment can be granted.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.
William J. Cavanagh v. Allen R. Arvig, Chris Mensing, individually and d/b/a Lakes Country Landscaping & Irrigation, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William J. Cavanagh v. Allen R. Arvig, Chris Mensing, individually and d/b/a Lakes Country Landscaping & Irrigation, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The moving party has the burden of showing an absence of factual issues before summary judgment can be granted.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Historic Ivy Tower, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Historic Ivy Tower, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The moving party has the burden of showing an absence of factual issues before summary judgment can be granted.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.
Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co. 817 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 2012
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 811 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 811 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“Summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.
Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co. 802 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co. 802 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“Summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.
Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club v. City of Shorewood 770 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club v. City of Shorewood 770 N.W.2d 184 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Anderson v. State Dep’t of Natural Res.
Southcross Commerce Center, LLP v. Tupy Properties, LLC 766 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Southcross Commerce Center, LLP v. Tupy Properties, LLC 766 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Anderson v. State Dep’t of Natural Res.
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 761 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
ANALYSIS “Summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2008
We have stated that “[sjummary judgment is appropriate when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res., see Minn. R. Civ.
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 711 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2006
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 711 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2006
See Anderson v. Dep’t of Natural Res.
Minnesota Voyageur Houseboats, Inc. v. Las Vegas Marine Supply, Inc. 708 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 2006
Minnesota Voyageur Houseboats, Inc. v. Las Vegas Marine Supply, Inc. 708 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 2006
Anderson v. State, Dep’t of Natural Res.