Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park, 699 N.W.2d 307.

29 citing documents.

Presbyterian Family Foundation On Behalf of Vulnerable Adult, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Dr. Eric Ringsred, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Farm Bureau Financial Services, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
But although we might construe court technical rules liberally in favor of substance over form to advance this policy, see, we have no power allowing or policy enticing us to override express legislative limits on the court’s authority to consider a matter, like 10 the procedural limit imposed by Minnesota Statutes section 572B.05.
Jomari E Alexander, Sr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Additionally, “[i]t is well settled under Minnesota common law that a co rporation must be represente d by an attorney in legal proceedings.” Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park
City of Shoreview, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Tesye Maskalo, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nevertheless, citing Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn Park , -44 (Minn. App. 2004), aff’d, appellant argues that this omission was a “curable defect” which he promptly addressed after it was identified.
In the Matter of a Petition for Decertification of an Exclusive Representative Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(applying rule 15.03), aff’d
Kelbro Co. v. Vinny's On the River, LLC 893 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kelbro Co. v. Vinny's On the River, LLC 893 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But the relevant portion of that opinion was implicitly overruled by the supreme court’s
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Citing Kontrick, this court has also cautioned against misuse of the word “jurisdictional.” –43 (Minn. App. 2004) (holding that absence of attorney signature on complaint brought by corporation is not jurisdictional defect), aff’d
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Hinckley Square Associates v. Leah D. Cervene 871 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hinckley Square Associates v. Leah D. Cervene 871 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
the Minnesota Supreme Court determined that a complaint filed and signed on behalf of a corporate entity by a layperson is not a legal nullity, holding that the signature could be a curable defect if the participation by the nonattorney is minimal.
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To the contrary, -10 (Minn. 2005), the supreme court adopted this court’s holding that lack of the appropriate signature on a complaint is not jurisdictional and is 7 curable.
Koriane Lawver v. Partner Up Promotions, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Koriane Lawver v. Partner Up Promotions, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
After a hearing, the district court dismissed Lawver’s motions in their entirety, -11 (Minn. 2005).
Laxman S. Sundae v. Jacob Salhus, Stacey Smith, Ryan Naddy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Laxman S. Sundae v. Jacob Salhus, Stacey Smith, Ryan Naddy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
advance the policy favoring resolution of cases on the merits”), aff’d, Westfield, d at 449 (stating that “the goal of litigation is to reach a resolution of disputes on the merits”); (“Courts should liberally apply [the Finden] factors to further the policy of resolving cases on their merits.”), review dismi
Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445 792 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445 792 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
906, 915 , 157 L.Ed.2d 867 (2004); -43 (Minn.App.2004) *458 (quoting Kontrick), aff'd
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
aff'd, (emphasis added).
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“It is well settled under Minnesota common law that a corporation must be represented by an attorney in legal proceedings.”
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Thomas Oil Co., Inc. v. Onsgaard, 298 Minn. 465, 469