Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334.

22 citing documents.

Kimi Bragdon v. Anthony Allen Davis, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Christopher Humphrey v. City of Minneapolis Civil Service Commission Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Brian’s Lawn & Landscaping, Inc. dba Rock Hard Landscape Supply v. Last Chance Ranch, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Council HRA, (defining a default judgment as “a judgment entered against a defendant who has failed to plead or otherwise defend against the plaintiff’s claim, often by failing to appear at trial”).
Belle Plaine MHP, LLC v. Brian Haugen Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Council HRA , (“A judgment by default is just as conclusive an adjudication between parties as any other.”).
In the Matter of Reba Mitchell’s Termination of Section 8 Benefits Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Council HRA, (applying 24 C.F.R.
Richard Duncan v. County of Chisago Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Council HRA , (quotation omitted).
Kelly Cedarberg v. Dakota County Community Development Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Council HRA , (quotation omitted).
Lisa A. Curtis v. Cloquet/Carlton Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Council HRA, (quotation omitted).
A16-0025 Guardian Interlock Systems v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A16-0025 Guardian Interlock Systems v. Minnesota Department of Public Safety, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Council HRA, (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Massage and Bodywork License Application of Kim Yi's, LLC, and Yong Green d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Massage and Bodywork License Application of Kim Yi's, LLC, and Yong Green d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Council HRA, (quotation omitted).
Nickijo L. Eichorn v. Itasca County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nickijo L. Eichorn v. Itasca County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Council HRA, (quotation omitted); see also Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (2014) (providing that reviewing court may affirm, remand, reverse, or modify administrative agency’s decision if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have been prejudiced because the administrative finding, inferences, conclusion, or
In the Matter of the License of Blaine Myles MacDonald, D.C. License No. 3343 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the License of Blaine Myles MacDonald, D.C. License No. 3343 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Council HRA, (quotation omitted).
Michaels v. First USA Title, LLC 844 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michaels v. First USA Title, LLC 844 N.W.2d 528 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Council HRA, (quotation omitted).
Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 759 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 759 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Council HRA (affirming termination of evicted *256 tenant’s Section 8 benefits because word “must” is mandatory).
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Schroeder 693 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Council HRA, (finding “must” language in section 8 regulations prohibited officer from considering hardships in evaluating termination of benefits); Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., (holding statutory requirement that motion for sanctions be made separately was mandatory), af