Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Irwin v. Goodno, 686 N.W.2d 878.

25 citing documents.

All-American Ice L.L.C., DBA All-American Arena Products, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
American Arena argues that the district court lacked subject- matter jurisdiction because it “had no legal authority to re- open and reverse claims that were subject to final 5 judgment and not appealed.” (defining subject-matter jurisdiction to include the “authority to hear and determine the particular questions the court assumes to decide”).
Northern Metals, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Crow Wing Recycling, Inc.,... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Northern Metals, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Crow Wing Recycling, Inc.,... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“District courts are courts of general jurisdiction and have the power to hear all types of civil cases, with a few exceptions.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brad Ronald Stevens. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A tribunal has subject -matter jurisdiction if it has the “authority to hear and determine a particular class of actions” and “the particular issues the court assume s to decide.” (quotations omitted) (concluding CAP erred by dismissing committed person’s petition for lack of subject - matter jurisdiction).
OTI, Inc., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Minnesota courts have consistently 4 recognized that statutory requirements limiting a court’s jurisdiction are threshold requirements that must be complied with before a court can exercise jurisdiction.” Irwin v. Goodno
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jesse James Adams. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Nicole Marie Stensrud. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Following oral arguments, we requested supplemental briefing on the issue of subject-matter jurisdiction “[b]ecause subject-matter jurisdiction goes to the authority of the court to hear a particular class of actions, lack of subject -matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew David Feeney. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Subject- matter jurisdiction is defined as not only authority to hear and determine a particular class of actions, but authority to hear and determine the particular questions the court assumes to decide.” (quotation omitted).
David Forster, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Subject-matter jurisdiction is defined as not only authority to hear and determine a particular class of actions, but authority to hear and determine the particular questions the court assumes to decide.” Irwin v. Goodno , (quotation omitted).
Sheehy Construction Company v. City of Centerville Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sheehy Construction Company v. City of Centerville Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Because subject-matter jurisdiction goes to the authority of the court to hear a particular class of actions, lack of subject-matter 11 jurisdiction may be raised at any time.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF: Brent Charles NIELSEN 863 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF: Brent Charles NIELSEN 863 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 802 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights 802 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“Subject-matter jurisdiction is defined as not only authority to hear and determine a particular class of actions, but authority to hear and determine the particular questions the court assumes to decide.” (quotation omitted).
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
ANALYSIS I. “Subject-matter jurisdiction is defined as not only authority to hear and determine a particular class of actions, but authority to hear and determine the particular questions the court assumes to decide.” (quotation omitted).
State Ex Rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 771 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State Ex Rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 771 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Minnesota “[district courts are courts of general jurisdiction and have the power to hear all types of civil cases, with a few exceptions.”
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Minn. Const, art. VI, § 3 (designating original jurisdiction in the district courts); (observing that Minnesota “[district courts are courts of general jurisdiction and have the power to hear all types of civil cases, with a few exceptions”).
In Re the Civil Commitment of Beaulieu 737 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Civil Commitment of Beaulieu 737 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Subject-matter jurisdiction is defined as a court’s authority to hear and determine either a particular class of actions or questions the court assumes to decide
Instant Testing Co. v. Community Security Bank 715 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Instant Testing Co. v. Community Security Bank 715 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“Minnesota courts have consistently recognized that statutory requirements limiting a court’s jurisdiction are threshold requirements that must be complied with before a court can exercise jurisdiction.” ().