Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Tice, 686 N.W.2d 351.

21 citing documents.

A19-1115 A19-1116 State of Minnesota v. Dmitry Suspitsyn (A19-1112), Michael John Mehr (A19-1113), Ahmed Hassen Ahmed (A19-1115), Ayanle … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Bonacci-Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
12 in the statute means “more likely than not.” State v. Tice , review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Rosalee Ann Grace Pickett Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The word ‘likely,’ as it is used in the statutory definition s of child neglect and child endangerment, means ‘more likely than not.’” -52 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Anderson 931 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Anderson 931 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Tice , , 353 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Cole Lyle Kjellberg Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The statute requires “more than ordinary civil negligence” and “more than a simple deviation from the standard of care.” d 351, 355 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Alyssa Rose Knoblauch Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Lia Pearson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Tice , review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Peter Pohl Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Joveda Marie Edwards Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This standard is higher than “ordinary civil negligence.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Sharon Marie O’Boyle v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Tice , review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Tressa Lee Bissonette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tressa Lee Bissonette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting that the child-neglect statute only criminalizes “conduct that is more than ordinary civil negligence”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Hobart Alvin Huffman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Hobart Alvin Huffman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
means ‘more likely than not.’” -52 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Javon Lamar Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Javon Lamar Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating 7 that, in using the terms willfully, intentionally, and recklessly in a statute, the legislature expressed intent not to criminalize ordinary negligence), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Rae Flint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Rae Flint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
355 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Weyaus 836 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Weyaus 836 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“[Calculated” means “intended,” and “[ljikely” means “probable” or “reasonably expected.” The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles 318, 1588 (1993 ed.); -55 (Minn.App.2004) (defining “ ‘likely1 ” in context of child-neglect and child-endangerment statutes as “ ‘more likely than not,’ ” noting that Black’s Law Dictionary 925 (6th ed.1990) defined “ ‘likely’ ” as “ ‘[pjrobable’ ”), review denied (Minn. Nov.