Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Collier, 726 N.W.2d 799.

78 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Petition of U.S. Bank, National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
David M. Smith, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“When the material facts are not in dispute, we review the lower court’s application of the law de novo.” d 799, 803 (Minn. 2007).4 Tenants argue that landlords’ arguments misconstrue the law.
M.A.A.C., Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Modrow v. JP Foodservice , Inc.
Mary Kate Nguyen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
DECISION On appeal from summary judgment, appellate courts “determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
A21-0832 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
k roads.” Moratzka’s application further stated: 4 Moratzka sought to register title pursuant to Minnesota Statutes chapter 508, otherwise known as the “Torrens Act,” which provides that “a party seeking to register an ownership interest in property [may] appl[y] for a court adjudication of ownership and a court decree that converts abstract property into Torrens property.”
City of Shorewood, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“When the material facts are not in dispute, we review the [district] court’s application of the law de novo.”
In the Matter of Enbridge Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota Kittson, Marshall, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Clearwater, … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(stating that unpublished decisions “do not constitute precedent”).
In the Matter of the Petition of Jane Serrano and Lynn Barbeau for certain relief relating to lands … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ellsworth Fretham, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Joseph Roach, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Carol Johnson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Wozniak Travel, Inc., n.2 (Minn. 2009) (stating that “the unpublished Minnesota court of appeals decision does not constitute precedent” ().
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. D. T. and J. M. O., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
3(c) (2018) (stating that “[u]npublished opinions of the Court of Appeals 8 are not precedential”); In re Collier , (noting that unpublished opinions are not precedential).
Ellis v. Doe 915 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ellis v. Doe 915 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Collier , , 803 (Minn. 2007).
Doran Development, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[A] purchaser of Torrens property who has actual knowledge of a prior, unregistered interest in the property is not a good faith purchaser.” 16
Trivedi, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“When the material facts are not in dispute, we review the lower court’s application of the law de novo.”).
Cheri Glassick v. Wells Federal Bank, Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Northwest Title Agency, Inc., Tim Breuer, Manufacturers Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cheri Glassick v. Wells Federal Bank, Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Northwest Title Agency, Inc., Tim Breuer, Manufacturers Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 799, 803 (Minn. 2007) (citing Leamington Co. v. Non-Profits’ Ins.
In the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., for an Order Determining the Boundary … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., for an Order Determining the Boundary … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
However, under section 508.25, “a purchaser of Torrens property who has actual knowledge of a prior, unregistered interest in the property is not a good faith purchaser.” In re Juran, 178 Minn. 55, 60, 226 N.W.
Merceil Burkhalter v. Dedrick D. Mays, Building Trades Federal Credit Union 877 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Merceil Burkhalter v. Dedrick D. Mays, Building Trades Federal Credit Union 877 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minn. Stat. § 508.25; (holding that section 508.25 provides good-faith purchasers protection against prior, unregistered interests in Torrens property).
Randy Lee Torgeson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randy Lee Torgeson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hinckley Square Associates v. Leah D. Cervene 871 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hinckley Square Associates v. Leah D. Cervene 871 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert P. Carlson, North Shore Federal Credit Union, Below. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ryan John Nordell v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert P. Carlson, North Shore Federal Credit Union, Below. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When the material facts are not in dispute, [appellate courts] review the 3 [district] court’s application of the law de novo.”
Ryan John Nordell v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Estate of Lawrence A. Werner by Vivian Eileen Werner, Personal Representative v. Kreg A. Werner, and third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Estate of Lawrence A. Werner by Vivian Eileen Werner, Personal Representative v. Kreg A. Werner, and third party … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In a proper challenge, the district court could apply the “principles of equity when a result under the Torrens Act violates notions of justice and good faith.”
Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. Hogenson Properties, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. Hogenson Properties, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“When the material facts are not in dispute, we review the [district] court’s application of the law de novo.”
Rosso v. Hallmark Homes of Minneapolis, Inc. 843 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rosso v. Hallmark Homes of Minneapolis, Inc. 843 N.W.2d 798 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“When the material facts are not in dispute, we review the lower court’s application of the law de novo.”
Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wartman 841 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wartman 841 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“When the material facts are not in dispute, we review the [district] court’s application of the law de novo.”
County of Scott v. Johnston 841 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
County of Scott v. Johnston 841 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“When the material facts are not in dispute, we review the [district] court’s application of the law de novo.”
In re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. 835 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. 835 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
We acknowledge that Minnesota courts have not commented on the standard of proof applicable to cases in which one party seeks to amend a certificate of title for Torrens property, known as “proceedings subsequent to initial registration.” See, (noting no standard of proof in a proceeding to determine the priority of interests subsequent to initial registration); Fid.
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2012
Followed Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2012
Ruikkie v. Nall 798 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Ruikkie v. Nall 798 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
It is well established that “the Torrens property system is distinct from the abstract property system.”