Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 748 N.W.2d 608.

76 citing documents.

Classic Auto Storage, LLC v. Restoration Technologies, Inc Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Classic Auto Storage, LLC v. Restoration Technologies, Inc Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Exch., (quotation omitted).
A25-0341 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A. Degree of Success Obtained NTE suggests that the district court erred by including hours that were spent on Engebretson’s unsuccessful reprisal claim, citing Milner v. Farmers Bank Insurance 19 Exchange
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. David P Williams, doing business as Bear Track ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. David P Williams, doing business as Bear Track ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
3 In addition, MnDOT’s is undermined by the shared posture of those cases.
Twin City Underwriters, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Exch., (describing the lodestar method).
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Ann Massert, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Exch., (citing Minn. R. Civ.
Accredited Electrical Solutions, LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Exch., d 608, 621 (Minn. 2008) (quotations omitted).
Athena 2004, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Exch., (setting forth Paulson factors as part of calculating lodestar amount).
Jessica Hagen, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Minn. 2021
(holding that the MFLSA and PWA are “related” and “provide a comprehensive statutory scheme for wages and payment in Minnesota and should be interpreted in light of each other”).
ProStar Exteriors, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Exch., (quotations omitted).
N.H., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Grand Central Lofts Phase I Condominiums, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Exch., (listing factors to consider when determining reasonableness under the lodestar method).
Herbert A. Igbanugo, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Exch., -21 (Minn. 2008).
Jeffery D. Gordon, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Commissioner Of Transportation v. Krause 925 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 2019
Commissioner Of Transportation v. Krause 925 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 2019
In Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange , a Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act case, we elaborated on the lodestar method and explained that we consider the "results obtained" in the initial lodestar calculation, not in determining whether an enhancement is warranted.
Suncom, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Curtis Trude, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Exch., -21 8 (Minn. 2008) (stating that the supreme court has “approved the use of the lodestar method for determining reasonable attorney fees,” which “requires the court to determine the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation multipl ied by a reasonable hourly rate” (quotations omitted)).
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 902 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 2017
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 902 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 2017
Exch., -15 (Minn. 2008) (explaining that Minn. Stat. § 177.27 , subd.
Shane A. Kennedy, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re: Guardianship and Conservatorship of Carolyn H. Jemison. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re: Guardianship and Conservatorship of Carolyn H. Jemison. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
David B. Markle v. Metro Metals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David B. Markle v. Metro Metals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
650 North Main Association v. Frauenshuh, Inc. (Territorial Springs Riverview, LLC, Frauenshuh Sweeney, LLC), Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, Doe … 885 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
650 North Main Association v. Frauenshuh, Inc. (Territorial Springs Riverview, LLC, Frauenshuh Sweeney, LLC), Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, Doe … 885 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Todd Burt v. Rackner, Inc. d/b/a Bunny�s Bar & Grill Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 882 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 2016
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 882 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 2016
Todd Burt v. Rackner, Inc. d/b/a Bunny�s Bar & Grill Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bruce Township v. Kevin Schmitz, Nathan A. Baum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bruce Township v. Kevin Schmitz, Nathan A. Baum Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Exch., (stating that legislative intent may be ascertained by considering, among other things, the language of other statutes that address the same subject matter); Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed Dist., 278 Minn. 1, 11, (stating that statutes in pari materia covering the same sub
Jon P. Hanbury, individually and as father and natural guardian of Andrew and Nick Hanbury v. American Family … 865 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jon P. Hanbury, individually and as father and natural guardian of Andrew and Nick Hanbury v. American Family … 865 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Exch., (stating that this court may consider other 9 related statutes in assessing legislative intent).
In re the Matter of: C. O. v. John and Jackie Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Matter of: C. O. v. John and Jackie Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marie Delores Green v. BMW of North America, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marie Delores Green v. BMW of North America, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cameron Court Homeowners Association v. Ngozichukwa Akubuike Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cameron Court Homeowners Association v. Ngozichukwa Akubuike Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Exch., -21 (Minn. 2008).
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 845 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 2014
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 845 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 2014
Likewise, in Milner, we stated that “[ijssues of fact that are not submitted to the jury on the special verdict form are left to the district court to decide.”
State v. Williams 842 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 2014
State v. Williams 842 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 2014
Exeh., (“Generally, we review an award of attorney fees for an abuse of discretion.”).
County of Dakota v. Cameron 839 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2013
County of Dakota v. Cameron 839 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by