A06-0490
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Aho v. DULUTH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Aho v. DULUTH TRANSIT AUTHORITY, 714 N.W.2d 428 (Minn. 2006).
Cited by
- State of Minnesota v. Jamie Alden Godbout Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. James Robert Hess Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Allan Carbo, Jr. 6 N.W.3d 114 Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Arnold Westrom 6 N.W.3d 145 Minn. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Said Sharif Maye Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Marcelo Mendez Zepeta Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Lidio Roque Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Anton Leo Schloegl Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Minn. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Hassan Farth Muse Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State v. Zinski 927 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2019
- State of Minnesota v. Clayton Francis Marshalek Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 1, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. BY THE COURT: /s/Sam Hanson Associate Justice