Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Theis, 742 N.W.2d 643.

441 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Bobby Joe Houle Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, vs Floyd Erik Hyde Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Arthur Rathbun Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Schirmer Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Tiffany Lynn Lambert Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Mark Alan Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[C]areful scrutiny of the factual basis for the plea is necessary within the context of an Alford plea because of the inherent conflict in pleading guilty while maintaining innocence.” -49 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Michael Means Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Michael Dejaris Denson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Lee Boulduc Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A proper factual basis must be established for a guilty plea to be accurate.” (); (stating that a claim of an insufficient factual basis to support a guilty plea is a challenge to the validity of the plea).
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Jude Schnagl Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An Alford plea “is valid if the defendant agrees that evidence the state is likely to offer at trial is sufficient to convict and if the district court independently determines that there is a strong factual basis for a finding of guilty and a strong probability that a jury would find the defendant guilty.” (internal quotations omitted)).
Leanne Starr v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[M]anifest injustice exists where a guilty plea is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Antion Deion Shelby, a/k/a Antione Tony Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[M]anifest injustice exists where a guilty plea is invalid.”
State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Because the fair-and-just standard is less demanding than the manifest-injustice standard, if Ellis-Strong shows his plea is invalid, he has shown both a manifest injustice and a fair-and-just reason to withdraw his plea as a matter of law.
State of Minnesota v. Edward Keith Dembry Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Clayton James Hanks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
Erasmo Monge Rauda v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Ronald James Fairbanks Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007) (holding that withdrawal is required when plea is invalid).
State of Minnesota v. Eugene Ryan Boos Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[M]anifest injustice exists where a guilty plea is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Alan Galardy Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Milton Joseph Budreau, III v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
5 I. A “manifest injustice exists where a guilty plea is in valid.”
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Morris Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Michael Dax Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A proper factual basis must be established for a guilty plea to be accurate.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Matthew King Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Emmett Moore, and Ryan Emmett Moore, vs. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Clemente Ramirez-Diaz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Emmett Moore, and Ryan Emmett Moore, vs. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[C]areful scrutiny of the factual basis for the plea is necessary within the context of an Alford plea because of the inherent conflict in pleading guilty while maintaining innocence.” -49 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Clemente Ramirez-Diaz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
While the fair-and-just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard,” a defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a plea before sentencing, and may not withdraw a guilty plea “for simply any reason.”
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Lynn Tjoens Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Lynn Tjoens Minn. Ct. App. 2017
While the fair-and-just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard,” a defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a plea before sentencing, and may not withdraw a guilty plea “for simply any reason.”
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Rae Guillette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Rae Guillette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Leroy Lamar Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Leroy Lamar Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION I. “A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Ranniger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gordon Ranniger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[M]anifest injustice exists where a guilty plea is invalid.”
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Abass Warsame Mumin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Abass Warsame Mumin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Frank Henry Stanhope Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Frank Henry Stanhope Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a valid guilty plea.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by