DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brodsky v. Brodsky, 733 N.W.2d 471.

145 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Michelle E. Li-Kuehne, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 471, 477 (Minn. App. 2007).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declin ing to address an in adequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Sonja Vogen Baertsch, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Bradley Jude Domagala, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Michael R. Shreve, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Anton v. Romona L. Sparks, f/k/a Romona L. Anton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Heidi B. Moon v. Roderick H. Moon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Heidi B. Moon v. Roderick H. Moon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“In proceedings under chapter 518, a district court may, in its discretion, award attorney fees against a party who unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the proceeding.” (quotations omitted); Minn. Stat. § 518.14, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Anton v. Romona L. Sparks, f/k/a Romona L. Anton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (citing this aspect of Wintz).
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Angela Swenson v. Shawn Anthony Pedri, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Angela Swenson v. Shawn Anthony Pedri, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Dawn Nyakundi v. Gilbert Ogamba Nyakundi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Guardianship/Conservatorship of: Lorraine Helen Schmidt. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Dawn Nyakundi v. Gilbert Ogamba Nyakundi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz).3 II.
In re the Guardianship/Conservatorship of: Lorraine Helen Schmidt. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately-briefed issue); (applying Wintz).
In re the Marriage of: Elizabeth Mary Ferguson v. Bradley Alan Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“An award of conduct-based attorney fees is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” (citing 10 review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: Elizabeth Mary Ferguson v. Bradley Alan Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Shawn R. Dooling, Bruce Polikowsky v. Caeasar Investment, LLC, (Intervenor). Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Followed Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Shawn R. Dooling, Bruce Polikowsky v. Caeasar Investment, LLC, (Intervenor). Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Generally, we adhere to the principle that “[a] party who inadequately briefs an argument waives an argument.” d 471, 479 (Minn. App. 2007).
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Pettey v. Melissa Denise Pettey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Pettey v. Melissa Denise Pettey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The district court must make findings to explain an award of conduct- based attorney fees.”
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Larson v. Brian Allen Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Larson v. Brian Allen Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
George Marita Obara, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF: D.L.D. and M.E.F., Parents 865 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF: D.L.D. and M.E.F., Parents 865 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that “[a] party who inadequately briefs an argument waives that argument”).
Jerrod Matthew Brown v. Amanda Marie Spoden, n/k/a Amanda Vinkemeier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerrod Matthew Brown v. Amanda Marie Spoden, n/k/a Amanda Vinkemeier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(internal citations omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Marie Sanvik, Below, Becky Toevs Rooney v. Charles W. Sanvik 850 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Marie Sanvik, Below, Becky Toevs Rooney v. Charles W. Sanvik 850 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marriage of Jones v. Jarvinen 814 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Jones v. Jarvinen 814 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
County of Grant v. Koser 809 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
County of Grant v. Koser 809 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus 801 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus 801 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that “issues not argued in *197 briefs must be deemed waived on appeal”) (quotation omitted); -80 (Minn.App.2007) (granting respondent’s motion to strike materials from appellant’s appendix that were stricken by district court because appellant waived his right to challenge issue by failing to address it in his brief).