Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brodsky v. Brodsky, 733 N.W.2d 471.

147 citing documents.

Jamie John Wojcik v. Michael John Wilson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See 18 (declining to consider an inadequately briefed issue).
In re the Marriage of: Marianne Michele Thayer v. Larry Frank Thayer Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“In proceedings under chapter 518, a district court may, in its discretion, award attorney fees against a party who unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the proceeding.” (quotations omitted) (citing Minn. Stat. § 518.14, subd.
A25-1856 Randy Kabe v. Beth Ann Celander, Beth Ann Celander, vs. Randy Kabe Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Brodsky v. Brodsky , (explaining that a party waives an argument by failing to adequately brief it).
Maureen A. Wobig v. Northern Tier Retail, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Custody of L.B.O.; Bibi Whited, et al v. Kenzie Quinn, Tyler Ohman, Rachel Norgaard, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In the Marriage of: Erin Marie Adams v. Cody Dan Adams, County of Blue Earth, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“In proceedings under chapter 518, a district court may, in its discretion, award attorney fees against a party who unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the proceeding.” (quotations omitted) (citing Minn. Stat. § 518.14, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Edward Nagle v. Maureen Mary Nagle Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Nichols, d at 734 (noting that a claim of mutual mistake must “be established by evidence [that] is clear and consistent, unequivocal and convincing”); (noting that inadequately briefed issues are forfeited).
In re the Marriage of: Diana Jakubauskiene v. Robertas Jakubauskas Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Matter of: Reuben Lopez Avery v. Teri Joanne Avery Minn. Ct. App. 2026
5 Inc., (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
Troy K. Scheffler v. Bob Jacobson, as Commissioner of Minn Dept of Public Safety, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
24, 2007); -80 (Minn. App. 2007) (recognizing that inadequately briefed arguments are forfeited).
In Re the Marriage of: Emily Brasel Brown v. Iyulli Ben Hyyiah Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in family law appeal).
Kidane Sante Shulbe v. Ashley Rose Henke, St. Louis County Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (applying this aspect of Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. D., C. J. M. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We nonetheless briefly address the alleged errors identified in the headings and conclude that, even if we were to reach the merits of the issues, we would still affirm.4 Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In Re the Custody of MIVB; Dustin Allen Basting v. Heather Mae Grehn Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
In the Marriage of: Jeneen Marie Molldrem v. Kevin Daniel Molldrem Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Wife is correct that “[a]ppellate courts may not consider matters outside the record on appeal.” Brodsky v. 20 Brodsky, (quotation omitted).
In Re the Marriage of: Erica Leigh Riehm v. Harold Andrew Riehm Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
In the Marriage of: Elizabeth Doree Hanson v. Todd David Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Elizabeth Doree Hanson v. Todd David Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Hewan Michael Hundessa v. Tesfa Bekele Balcha Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed question); (applying Wintz to an appeal of a marriage-dissolution judgment).
In the Marriage of: Pawel Dominik Rzeczkowski v. Carolina Uribe Borrero Minn. Ct. App. 2025
And although the 11 district court did not consider father’s ability to pay the fees, we have said that a proper award for conduct-based attorney fees “may be made regardless of the recipient ’s need or the payor’s ability to pay.”
In re the Marriage of: Brian Wayne Kusie v. Stephanie Louise Kusie Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The “court must make findings to explain an award of conduct-based attorney fees.”
In Re the Custody of: C.A.C. and P.M.C.; Brian Adam Castagneri v. Ashley Jo Klingbeil Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in family-law appeal).
In the Matter of the Application of Jesus Adrian Soto for a Change of Name of Minor Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in family-law appeal).
In Re the Marriage of: Mark O. Onyenemezu v. Faith Chioma Onyenemezu Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an 12 inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Oluwafunbi Ige Olusina v. Ann Oludolapo Olusina Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. , (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal); d 303, 309 n.6 (Minn. App. 2024) (citing Wintz and Brodsky).
Angeleah Joy Brandt v. Garrett James Brandt, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue); Brodsky v. Brodsky , (applying Wintz in family- law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Stacy Ann Bednar v. Craig Richard Bednar Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Brodsky v. Brodsky , d 471, 477 (Minn. App. 2007).
Justin Thomas Skyberg v. Danielle Christen Orlich, County of Sherburne, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal).
Will & Appt of the Estate of: William C. Mackey, Dec’d 7 N.W.3d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Will & Appt of the Estate of: William C. Mackey, Dec’d 7 N.W.3d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Thiele, d at 582; (declining to address laches argument where it was not properly before the court).
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag v. David Alan Slag Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Petition of U.S. Bank, National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
at 582; (holding that conclusory arguments made without the support of legal authority are forfeited).
In re the Marriage of: Chriss O. Latterell v. Mary Jean Latterell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Chriss O. Latterell v. Mary Jean Latterell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Itasca County Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Itasca County Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Xiaoyan Sun v. Qiang Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Chazin v. Kristin Chazin Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Matter of: Bamidele Adetifa v. Nehplainseh Pay-Bayee Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The district court must make findings to explain an award of conduct-based attorney fees.”
Platinum Edge Properties, LLC, et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“A party who inadequately briefs an argument waives that argument.”).
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Jo Pemberton v. Stephen Blake Pemberton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); Brodsky v. 18 Brodsky, (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Tabitha Ann Sanborn v. Matthew Charles Sanborn Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal).
In the Matter of: Heidi Sue Heller, obo minor children v. Beau Thomas Geisler Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Mussehl v. Fred Richard Mussehl Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to address an inadequately briefed iss ue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal).
In re the Matter of: John Erik Ensrud v. Janette Lea Eastman Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Anderson v. Joshua Christian Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Daniel Lorbiecke v. Wendy Leigh Lorbiecke Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Matter of: Elizabeth Joy Glirbas (n/k/a Elizabeth Joy Southwell) v. Joshua Robert Glirbas Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).