Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brodsky v. Brodsky, 733 N.W.2d 471.

145 citing documents.

A25-1854 A25-1856 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Brodsky v. Brodsky , (explaining that a party waives an argument by failing to adequately brief it).
Maureen A. Wobig, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Custody of L.B.O.; Bibi Whited v. Kenzie Quinn, Tyler Ohman, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“In proceedings under chapter 518, a district court may, in its discretion, award attorney fees against a party who unreasonably contributes to the length or expense of the proceeding.” (quotations omitted) (citing Minn. Stat. § 518.14, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Nichols, d at 734 (noting that a claim of mutual mistake must “be established by evidence [that] is clear and consistent, unequivocal and convincing”); (noting that inadequately briefed issues are forfeited).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
5 Inc., (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
Troy K. Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
24, 2007); -80 (Minn. App. 2007) (recognizing that inadequately briefed arguments are forfeited).
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in family law appeal).
Kidane Sante Shulbe, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (applying this aspect of Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. D., C. J. M. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
We nonetheless briefly address the alleged errors identified in the headings and conclude that, even if we were to reach the merits of the issues, we would still affirm.4 Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In Re the Custody of MIVB; Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed question); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Wife is correct that “[a]ppellate courts may not consider matters outside the record on appeal.” Brodsky v. 20 Brodsky, (quotation omitted).
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to review question that was not adequately briefed); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
In the Marriage of: Elizabeth Doree Hanson v. Todd David Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Elizabeth Doree Hanson v. Todd David Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed question); (applying Wintz to an appeal of a marriage-dissolution judgment).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
And although the 11 district court did not consider father’s ability to pay the fees, we have said that a proper award for conduct-based attorney fees “may be made regardless of the recipient ’s need or the payor’s ability to pay.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The “court must make findings to explain an award of conduct-based attorney fees.”
In Re the Custody of: C.A.C. and P.M.C.; Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in family-law appeal).
In the Matter of the Application of Jesus Adrian Soto for a Change of Name of Minor. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in family-law appeal).
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an 12 inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Oluwafunbi Ige Olusina, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. , (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal); d 303, 309 n.6 (Minn. App. 2024) (citing Wintz and Brodsky).
Angeleah Joy Brandt, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address inadequately briefed issue); Brodsky v. Brodsky , (applying Wintz in family- law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Brodsky v. Brodsky , d 471, 477 (Minn. App. 2007).
Justin Thomas Skyberg, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal).
Will & Appt of the Estate of: William C. Mackey, Dec'd 7 N.W.3d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Will & Appt of the Estate of: William C. Mackey, Dec'd 7 N.W.3d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Thiele, d at 582; (declining to address laches argument where it was not properly before the court).
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Petition of U.S. Bank, National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
at 582; (holding that conclusory arguments made without the support of legal authority are forfeited).
In re the Marriage of: Chriss O. Latterell v. Mary Jean Latterell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Chriss O. Latterell v. Mary Jean Latterell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Beth Kremer v. Robbie Michael Kremer Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Respondent,... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher v. Olga Sergeyevna Bessenbacher, Respondent,... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Xiaoyan Sun, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Matter of: Bamidele Adetifa, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The district court must make findings to explain an award of conduct-based attorney fees.”
Platinum Edge Properties, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“A party who inadequately briefs an argument waives that argument.”).
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Jo Pemberton, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); Brodsky v. 18 Brodsky, (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Tabitha Ann Sanborn, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal).
In the Matter of: Heidi Sue Heller, obo minor children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Mussehl, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., d 480, 480 (Minn. 1997) (declining to address an inadequately briefed iss ue); (applying Wintz in a family law appeal).
In re the Matter of: John Erik Ensrud, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Laura Marie Anderson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family- law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Erica Hopper McMullen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
1.” d 471, 477 (Minn. App. 2007).
Arctos Wealth Management and Fiduciary LLC, o/b/o Irvin John Cooper, Sr., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc., (declining to address an inadequately briefed issue); (applying Wintz in a family-law appeal).