Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson, 732 N.W.2d 312.

37 citing documents.

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Joseph James LaFrance, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“Because the nature of judicial decision- making is to resolve disputes, the judicial function does not comprehend the giving of advisory opinions.” 1 LaFrance also argues that any definition of “firearm” in Minnesota would be preempted by federal law.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. E. D. and D. L. S., Jr. … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Marion O’Neill, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A21-0403 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Free Minnesota Small Business Coalition, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Essar Global Fund Limited, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Sviggum v. Hanson , (quotation omitted).
Save Lake Calhoun, Minn. 2020
A18-1615 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Zach Nubbe and Mineral Service Plus, LLC, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Cleveland-Cliffs Minnesota Land Development, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Joel Marvin Munt, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Minn. Living Assistance, Inc. 919 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Minn. Living Assistance, Inc. 919 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sviggum v. Hanson , , 321 (Minn. App. 2007) (quoting Izaak Walton League of Am.
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Antwone Ford, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Joel Marvin Munt v. Michelle Smith, Warden, MCF-OPH Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Joel Marvin Munt v. Michelle Smith, Warden, MCF-OPH Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that the quo warranto remedy may be applied to ongoing exercise of power).
Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 859 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Carney v. State 792 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Carney v. State 792 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(explaining that “judiciary must act prudentially to abstain from encroaching on the power of a coequal branch”).
Howe v. Hauge 766 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Howe v. Hauge 766 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Pechovnik v. Pechovnik 765 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Pechovnik v. Pechovnik 765 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Kottschade v. City of Rochester 760 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Kottschade v. City of Rochester 760 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(quoting Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl.
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(discussing general requirement of re-dressable injury).
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 748 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 748 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2008