Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Erickson v. State, 725 N.W.2d 532.

30 citing documents.

Mark Scott Hendrickson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
see also Minn. Stat. § 611.14(2) (2024).
Remona Lysa Brown, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 532, 535 (Minn. 2007).
Anthony Scott David Auginaush, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
John Thomas Owen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
William Dumont White, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A petitioner seeking postconvi ction relief has the burden of establishing by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the facts warrant relief.” Erickson v. State , (quotation omitted).
John Stephen Woodward, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
” Erickson v. State , (Minn. 11 Accordingly, the postconviction court acted well within its discretion in denying Woodward’s petition as both time- and Knaffla-barred.
Lawrence Silas Kostohryz, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The state argues that the denial of postconviction relief was proper “because appellant failed to meet his affirmative burden to prove that he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel.” “A petitioner seeking postconviction relief has the burden of establishing by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the facts warrant relief.” d 532, 534 (Minn. 2007) (quotation omitted).
Gerald James Risk, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotations and citations omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(citing Jones v. Barnes , 463 U.S. 745, 751, 103 S. Ct. 3308, 3312 (1983)).
Robert Webb, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Allegations in a petition for postconviction relief must be “more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” 3 On March 31, 2020, Webb, acting without counsel, petitioned for a writ of certiorari, which this court construed as a notice of appeal.
Justin Lee Ironhawk, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A17-1623 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
But “[t]he U.S. Supreme C ourt has ‘recognized that the accu sed has the ultimate authority to make certain fundamental decisions regarding the case, as to whether to plead guilty, waive a jury, testify in his or her own behalf, or take an appeal.’” d 532, 536 (Minn. 2007) (quoting Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751, 103 S. Ct. 3308, 3312 (1983)).
Armando DeLaCruz, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 Typically, “The Knaffla rule bars postconviction claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel after direct appeal except when the merits of the claim cannot be determined from the district court record and requires additional evidence, such as that involving attorney - client communications.” -36 (Minn. 2007) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. M. W. and H. E. P., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Leanne Starr, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ul timately, the burden rests with the petitioner seeking postconviction relief to establish “by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the facts warrant relief.” (quotation omitted).
Ronnie Jerome Jackson, III, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, (stating that the defendant, not trial counsel, has “the ultimate authority .
Erickson v. State 842 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2014
Erickson v. State 842 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2014
Erickson v. State (Erickson II)
Dereje v. State 812 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Dereje v. State 812 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Barnes v. State 768 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
Barnes v. State 768 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
Williams v. State 764 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2009
Williams v. State 764 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2009
Sanchez-Diaz v. State 758 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2008
Sanchez-Diaz v. State 758 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2008
(observing that defendant has a fundamental right to decide “ ‘whether to plead guilty, waive a jury, testify in his or her own behalf, or take an appeal’ ”) (citing Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751 , 103 S.Ct.
Ashby v. State 752 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 2008
Ashby v. State 752 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 2008
Brown v. State 746 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 2008
Brown v. State 746 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 2008