Cited by

We do not interpret the definitions beyond what is expressly indicated in the act, id., but precluding the district court from considering the criminal statutes when determining if “domestic abuse” occurred would be “contrary to the liberal construction that is to be given to remedial legislation” like the act here

Such tools include “the occasion and 11 necessity for the law, the object to be attained, and the consequences of a particular interpretation.” 07 (Minn. 2008).

– 39 (Minn. App. 2007), aff’d in part, rev’d in part , .

(citing Minn. Stat. § 260C.001, subd.

810 n.4 (Minn. 2008) ("Whether we agree or disagree with that policy decision is of no importance.

In re Welfare of the Children of N.F., 735, 737 (Minn. App. 2007) aff’d in part, rev’d in part

When determining the scope of reasonable disciplinary force, we have considered a child’s age, height, and weight; “the seriousness of the [child’s] infraction; the degree of force used by the parent; and the physical impact of the discipline.” –39 (Minn. App. 2007), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds

When determining the scope of reasonable disciplinary force, we have considered “the child’s age, height, and weight; the seriousness of the [child’s] infraction; the degree of force used by the parent; and the physical impact of the discipline.” –39 (Minn. App. 2007), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds

–39 (Minn. App. 2007), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds

When determining the scope of reasonable disciplinary force, this court has considered a child’s age, height, and weight; “the seriousness of the [child’s] infraction; the degree of force used by the parent; and the physical impact of the discipline.” -39 (Minn. App. 2007), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds

I), aff'd in part and rev’d in part

and S.F., Harris v. Cnty.

(noting doctrine of in pari materia, by which statutes with common subject matter and purposes are construed together).