Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brocks v. State, 753 N.W.2d 672.

36 citing documents.

Jason Lee Martin, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-86 (Minn. 2016); d 520, 523 n.4 (Minn. 2013)
Jacob William Kinn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Jacob William Kinn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
n.3 (Minn. 2008) (“Failure to brief or argue an issue on appeal results in waiver of that issue on appeal.”).
Lance Arnold Kingbird, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A petitioner’s allegations in support of a hearing “must be more than argumentative assertions without factual support,” (quotation omitted), and “[ i]f material facts that would entitle a petitioner to relief are in dispute, the court must grant a hearing,”
Richard Theodore Knoll, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A petitioner’s allegations in support of a hearing “must be more than argumentative assertions without factual support.” (quotation omitted).
Bunny Annette Byington, Minn. 2022
d 672, 676 (Minn. 2008) (stating that claims raised for the first time on appeal, where a district court did not consider it, are forfeited for the purposes of the appeal).
Diamond Lee Jamal Griffin, Minn. 2021
(holding that petitioner forfeited a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to include the issue in his postconviction petition).
Leonard Goodloe, Minn. 2019
Neal Curtis Zumberge, Minn. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 (2018); (construing the hearing requ ired by section 590.04 to be an evidentiary hearing).
Onyelobi v. State 932 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2019
Onyelobi v. State 932 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2019
Brocks v. State , , 675 (Minn. 2008) ; see also, e.g. , Swaney v. State , , 215 (Minn. 2016) (" Knaffla's interests-of-justice exception ...
Helen Marie Mauch, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See 12 McKenzie v. State , (“[A]n ineffective assistance of counsel claim fits within the second exception to Knaffla if it cannot be determined from the district court record and requires additional evidence.” (quotation omitted)); -76 (Minn. 2008) (noting that Knaffla exceptions apply only to claims a defendant failed to raise on direct appeal and concluding that postconviction ineffective-assistance-of trial-counsel claims were Knaffla barred where petitioner raised, and supreme court rejecte
Gail v. State 888 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 2016
Gail v. State 888 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 2016
(“[T]he Knaffla exceptions apply only to claims that a defendant failed to raise on direct appeal”).
Derrick Delmar Brocks v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2016
Derrick Delmar Brocks v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2016
Brocks v. State (Brocks II)
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
(“Brocks did not raise this issue in his [postconviction] petition .
Randy Leeroyal Swaney v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2016
Randy Leeroyal Swaney v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. James Lamar Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. James Lamar Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“In general, issues not raised in the parties’ briefs are waived.” n.3 (Minn. 2008) (“Failure to brief or argue an issue on appeal results in waiver of that issue on appeal.”).
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(concluding that an issue was not properly before the supreme court because appellant “did not raise [the] issue in his 1 He also argues that “the postconviction court abused its discretion when denying [his] motion to withdraw his guilty plea.” We have already addressed that argument above.
Kim Thul Ouk v. State 847 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 2014
Kim Thul Ouk v. State 847 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 2014
Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
675 n. 3 (Minn.2008) (“Failure to brief or argue an issue on appeal results in waiver of that issue on appeal.”).
Greer v. State 836 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2013
Greer v. State 836 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2013
(holding that issue not raised before the postconviction court was forfeited for the purposes of appeal); (declining to address issue that was not raised in the postconviction court).
Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
675 n. 3 (Minn.2008); , 746 n. 1 (Minn.1998).
Barnes v. State 768 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
Barnes v. State 768 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338, 339 , -33 (Minn.2009); , 675 n. 3 (Minn.2008).