Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kuhlmann, 806 N.W.2d 844.

142 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 844, 848 (Minn. 2011).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A structural error is an error in a proceeding that is so severe that it triggers “automat ic reversal of a conviction.” -51 (Minn. 2011).
State v. Luby 904 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 2017
State v. Luby 904 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A defendant’s right to a jury trial includes “the right to a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Kuhlmann , (quotation omitted ).
State v. Edwards 900 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Edwards 900 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Kuhlmann , -49 (Minn. 201 1).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A defendant has “the right to a ‘jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.’” (quoting United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 510, 115 S. Ct. 2310, 2313 (1995)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See -85 (Minn. 2014) (applying pl ain-error analysis to district court’s error in failing to obtain from defendant new jury-trial waiver after state filed amended complaint adding new criminal charge); -53 (Minn. 2011) (applying plain-error analysis to unobjected-to error in failing to obtain valid jury-trial waiver from defendant).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Otis Rodney Elder, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kong Pheng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kong Pheng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Baron Montero Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Baron Montero Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Structural errors are such where “[t]he entire conduct of the [proceeding] from beginning to end is obviously affected, and without the basic protections guaranteed by the right being violated, no criminal punishment may be regarded as fundamentally fair.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson 882 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson 882 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 2016
-51 (Minn. 2011) (noting that few errors are structural, and other constitutional errors are reviewed to determine whether they were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt).
State of Minnesota v. Grant Jason Bresnahan Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Grant Jason Bresnahan Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 844, 850 (Minn. 2011) (“Generally, most constitutional errors are reviewed for harmless error.”).
State of Minnesota v. David Mendoza Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Mendoza Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Structural errors “defy analysis by ‘harmless-error’ standards” and therefore “require automatic reversal of a conviction.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Eugene Sirois Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Eugene Sirois Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dustin James Wallin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dustin James Wallin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 844, 852 (Minn. 2011).
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Structural errors “defy analysis by ‘harmless-error’ standards” and therefore “require automatic reversal of a conviction.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Alan Edsill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Alan Edsill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
If the three prongs are met, we examine whether the error “seriously affects the fairness and integrity of the judicial proceedings.” -53 (Minn. 2011).
Darryl Colbert v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 2015
Darryl Colbert v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tabashish Anamiki Ogitchida Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tabashish Anamiki Ogitchida Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paris Pierre Pollard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paris Pierre Pollard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nazar Taher Mohammed Alfahed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nazar Taher Mohammed Alfahed Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ge Her 862 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ge Her 862 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2015
Blakely, 542 U.S. at 306; (describing the jury-trial 4 right).
State of Minnesota v. Artis Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Artis Iverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(applying plain- error analysis to jury-trial waiver on stipulated elements); d 278, 281-82 (Minn. App. 2005), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Vida Kay Bjorklund Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vida Kay Bjorklund Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015