Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of J.B., 782 N.W.2d 535.

96 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Custody of L.B.O.; Bibi Whited v. Kenzie Quinn, Tyler Ohman, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of J.B., -44 (Minn. 2010) for the principle that “cumulative procedural failures may amount to a due-process violation.” But J.B.
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Death Benefit for Eric William Groebner (Deceased) Minn. 2026
–40 (Minn. 2010) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
City of Long Lake, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle Minn. 2025
(“Resort to legislative history to interpret a statute is generally appropriate only where the statute itself is ambiguous.”); (“We do not need to resort to legislative history when a statute is unambiguous.”)
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. O. and D. W., Commissioner of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. O. and D. W., Commissioner of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
And “our task here is limited to interpreting the statutory [language] as enacted by the Legislature.” see also Amaral, d at 384 (“When interpreting a statute, we may not disregard the letter of the law under the pretext of pursuing the spirit of the law.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Custody of H. T. J. and H. W. J., Minor Children, Tyler Raymond Johnson, Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Ryan Chrz, Minn. 2023
Chrz’s suggestion that eligibility for benefits extends past the time he has a diagnosis of PTSD is also incompatible with the interpretative canon expressio unius est exclusio alterius, which means that “the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another.”
In the Matter of the Estate of: Mathew Joseph Tomczik, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of J.B., see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2020).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of J.B., (“Resort to legislative history to interpret a statute is generally appropriate only where the statute itself is ambiguous.”); (“A statute is only ambiguous if its language is subject to more than one 8 reasonable interpretation.”).
In re the Marriage of: Tammy Kay Holleman, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The district court’s decision to invoke its contempt powers is subject to reversal for abuse of discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
John Moore, Minn. 2021
Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2020).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Resort to legislative history to interpret a statute is generally appropriate only where the statute itself is ambiguous.”
Adam C. Steele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The district court’s decision to invoke its contempt powers is subject to reversal for abuse of discretion.” Mower Cty.
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 535, 538 (Minn. 2010).
Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom 925 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2019
Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom 925 N.W.2d 233 Minn. 2019
State v. Lagred 923 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Lagred 923 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kimberly Brinkman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Jesse A. Freking, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The district court’s decision to invoke its contempt powers is subject to reversal for an abuse of discretion,” and we “will reverse the factual findings 25 of a civil contempt order only if [the] findings are clearly erroneous.” .
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re G. J. Parents F. 920 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A18-0333 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Mike 919 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Mike 919 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. Z., J. P. B., S. C. D. … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Thonesavanh 904 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2017
Foreign Subpoena’s Request for Jurisdictional Subpoena’s for Aaron Jordan and Dwight Walvatne Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 892 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 2017
Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 892 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 2017
See, ("Resort to legislative history to interpret a statute is generally appropriate only where the statute itself is ambiguous.”)
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P. A., f/k/a Mohrman & Kaardal, P. A. v. Gene Rechtzigel, Gene Rechtzigel as … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P. A., f/k/a Mohrman & Kaardal, P. A. v. Gene Rechtzigel, Gene Rechtzigel as … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court’s decision to invoke its contempt powers is subject to reversal for abuse of discretion.”
In re the Matter of: Eric Joseph Vacko v. Teri Ann Shults Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Eric Joseph Vacko v. Teri Ann Shults Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Donna Jean Sjolander f/k/a Donna Jean Carlson v. Steven Gary Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Donna Jean Sjolander f/k/a Donna Jean Carlson v. Steven Gary Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION I. “The district court’s decision to invoke its contempt powers is subject to reversal for abuse of discretion.”
In re: The Burial of Irina Kurdyumova (Deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re: The Burial of Irina Kurdyumova (Deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Equity Residential Holdings, LLC v. Gerald Koenig Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend 869 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The district court’s decision to invoke its contempt powers is subject to reversal for abuse of discretion.”
Equity Residential Holdings, LLC v. Gerald Koenig Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Id.; (applying canons of construction to statute concerning right to counsel in juvenile protection proceedings).