Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Moua v. State, 778 N.W.2d 286.

40 citing documents.

Christopher James Hayes, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Howard William Amos v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Howard William Amos v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Absent an established exception, a postconviction petition filed after this period “must be dismissed as untimely.”
Ronald Lewis Greer v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2024
Ronald Lewis Greer v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2024
6 evidence clearly and convincingly establishes innocence, where a change in the law applies to the petitioner’s case, or where ‘the petition is not frivolous and is in the interests of justice.’ ” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
Thomas Robert Tichich, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d more than two years after the later of: (1) the entry of judgment of convi ction or sentence if no direct appeal is filed; or (2) an appellate court’s disposition of petitioner’s direct appeal.” If a petitioner files a direct appeal, subject to certain exceptions, they may not file a petition for postconviction relief more than two years after their conviction is “final.” Moua v. State
St. Louis County Gildea, C.J. Tyrone James White, Appellant, vs. Minn. 2023
See Moua v. State , (discussing finality of convictions).
Jerrmaine Winston Knowles, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(holding that a disposition was final 90 days after entry of judgment).
Fredrick Dewayne Hines, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
2 (providing for 30-day period to petition Minnesota Supreme Court for review); (recognizing that a conviction becomes final when 4 the judgment has been rendered, the availability of appeal has been exhausted, and the time for petition for review has elapsed).
Michael Frederick Schmidt, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Moua v. State , ; see also 28 U.S.C.
Jeremia Joseph Loper, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Fox v. State 913 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 2018
Fox v. State 913 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 2018
Moua v. State , , 288 (Minn. 2010).
Raymond Joseph Traylor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 286, 288 (Minn. 2010).
Desmon Demond Burks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Desmon Demond Burks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Francis Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Francis Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION Appellate courts “review postconviction decisions under the abuse-of-discretion standard of review.”
David Richard Carlson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David Richard Carlson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Frank Anthony Mendoza v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Frank Anthony Mendoza v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Harold David Yaritz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Harold David Yaritz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Larry Roosevelt Noble v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Larry Roosevelt Noble v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Berkovitz v. State 826 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 2013
Berkovitz v. State 826 N.W.2d 203 Minn. 2013
4(a)(2), a conviction becomes “final” 90 days after we issue our decision); (noting that a conviction is final under Minn.Stat.
Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Followed Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
(discussing finality of convictions).
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
(discussing finality of convictions).
Roby v. State 808 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2011
Roby v. State 808 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2011
2 Roby’s conviction became final in 1990, 90
Gassler v. State 787 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2010
Gassler v. State 787 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2010
(“But Moua does not explain, and we fail to see, how the interests of justice favor the hearing of his petition.”).
Hannon v. State 781 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2010
Hannon v. State 781 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2010
(holding that for purposes of the amendment’s effective date provision, Moua’s conviction became final 90 days after we affirmed his conviction).
Toua Hong Chang v. State 778 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Toua Hong Chang v. State 778 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
4(a), (b) (2006) (emphasis added)