Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Martinez-Mendoza, 804 N.W.2d 1.

53 citing documents.

Duane Charles Hippe, Jr. v. Dakota County Sheriff Joe Leko Minn. Ct. App. 2026
5, clearly and unambiguously provides that a ‘conviction’ occurs when the district court accepts the guilty plea and the acceptance is on the record.” see also State v. Martinez- 8 Mendoza, (stating that “a conviction requires that a district court both accept and record the guilty plea” and holding “that a court ‘records’ a guilty plea upon accepting the guilty plea and adjudicating the defendant guilty on the record” (quotation and citations omitted)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jason Turner Johnson, Appellant Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jason Turner Johnson, Appellant Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
and held that a “court reporter’s transcription of the proceedings[]is all that is required for a conviction to be recorded.” Nodes, d at 81 (quotations omitted).
Andrew Henry Lieberman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Andrew Henry Lieberman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
But the question remains as to whether the district court’s amendment of the sentencing order to vacate the kidnapping conviction and enter a conviction for criminal sexual predatory conduct constituted a “second prosecution.” To support his argument that it did, Lieberman compares his case to two Minnesota Supreme Court cases:
Emem Ufot Udoh, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that appellate courts avoid advisory opinions and therefore concluding that it would not address whether the state could recharge the defendant when it had not yet attempted to do so).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
Minn. 2021
Erik Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[A] court ‘records’ a guilty plea upon accepting the guilty plea and adjudicating the defendant guilty on the record.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[A] court ‘records’ a guilty plea upon accepting the guilty plea and adjudicating the defendant guilty on the record.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“We review the interpretation of procedural rules de novo.”
Raymond Ernest DeGroat, Sr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Hill 918 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Hill 918 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, e.g. , State v. Martinez-Mendoza , , 13 (Minn. 2011) (citing Ohio v. Johnson , 467 U.S. 493 , 501-02, 104 S.Ct.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court records a guilty plea either by “accepting the guilty plea and adjudicating the defendant guilty on the record,” d 1, 6 (Minn. 2011), or by entry of formal judgment of conviction, State v. Jeffries
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court records a guilty plea either by “accepting the guilty plea and adjudicating the defendant guilty on the record,” d 1, 6 (Minn. 2011), or by entry of formal judgment of conviction, State v. Jeffries
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
jeopardy attaches, at the latest, following a conviction.” (“Jeopardy attaches after the district court accepts a guilty plea and a djudicates the defendant guilty.”).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Robert Politano Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Robert Politano Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appellate courts “review the interpretation of procedural rules de novo.”
Mohamed Abdule Ahmed v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mohamed Abdule Ahmed v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
5, ) (alterations omitted).
Nuvola, LLC v. Morgan Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nuvola, LLC v. Morgan Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review the interpretation of procedural rules de novo.”
Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 40 n.2 (quoting State v. Martinez–Mendoza, ).
Willie Edd Reynolds v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Willie Edd Reynolds v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ramsey County Child Support, S. G. M. M. v. J. A. Q. 872 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ramsey County Child Support, S. G. M. M. v. J. A. Q. 872 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Lawrence Gerads Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Lawrence Gerads Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Thomas Boutilier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Thomas Boutilier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
5 (2012), and “a court ‘records’ a guilty plea upon accepting the guilty plea and adjudicating the defendant guilty on the record.” ().
Harvey Ray Dupey v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2015
Harvey Ray Dupey v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2015
A guilty plea is “recorded” when the court “adjudicat[es] the defendant guilty on the record.” (emphasis added).
Ramsey County, A. L. A. v. E. v. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ramsey County, A. L. A. v. E. v. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Carl Lee Nodes 863 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Carl Lee Nodes 863 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 2015
In State v. Martinez-Mendoza, we said more specifically that “a court ‘records’ a guilty plea upon accepting the guilty plea and adjudicating the defendant guilty on the record.” (interpreting the definition of “conviction” in Minn. Stat. § 609.02, subd.
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 859 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 859 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2015
Endowment, Inc. v. State Dep’t of Natural Res., 312 Minn. 587, 589, (explaining that as a general rule “[t]he judicial function does not comprehend the giving of advisory opinions”); (stating that we do not issue advisory opinions); (same).
State v. Miller 849 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Miller 849 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. St. John 847 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. St. John 847 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
3 n. 1 (Minn.2011) (noting that some of the multiple offenses designated as second-degree criminal sexual conduct “are categorized as more serious conduct and carry longer presumptive sentences”).
State v. Carlson 845 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Carlson 845 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Montermini 819 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 2012