Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brayton v. Pawlenty, 781 N.W.2d 357.

70 citing documents.

Resolution Non-Renewing Probationary Teaching Contract. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts 4 “determine legislative intent primarily from the language of the statute itself.” (quotation omitted).
Jeremy Michael Kilde, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minn. Sands, LLC v. Cnty. of Winona 917 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Minn. Sands, LLC v. Cnty. of Winona 917 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Brayton v. Pawlenty , , 363 (Minn. 2010).
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
Brayton v. Pawlenty , , 363 (Minn. 2010).
A17-0729 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The plain language of the statute controls only if it is unambiguous and “is susceptible to only one reasonable meaning.”
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
We explained in Brayton v. Pawlenty that the Legislature and the Governor must work together in the budget process, but the Executive’s constitution-ai powers in the legislative budget process are limited to approval and veto powers
A16-2034 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. S.A.M. 891 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2017
STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of Hennepin 886 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of Hennepin 886 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2014)
J.D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 878 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2016
Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates 876 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The goal of statutory interpretation is to “ascertain and to effectuate the intention of the legislature.” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2008)).
Curtis G. and Stacy S. Marks v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 875 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2016
Curtis G. and Stacy S. Marks v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 875 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2016
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
Ethan Dean v. City of Winona 868 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2015
Ethan Dean v. City of Winona 868 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2015
In the Matter of Xcel's Request to Issue Renewable Development Fund Cycle 4 Requests for Proposals and Petition … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of Xcel's Request to Issue Renewable Development Fund Cycle 4 Requests for Proposals and Petition … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Billion v. Comm’r of Revenue
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 853 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2014
LumiData, Inc., Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue 853 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2014
Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 853 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2014
LumiData, Inc., Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue 853 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2014
see Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2012).
Patti Walsh, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Dean Patrick Walsh v. Flint Group … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Patti Walsh, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Dean Patrick Walsh v. Flint Group … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones 848 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones 848 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2014
accord Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2012).
State v. Nelson 842 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2014
Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 839 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
McCaughtry v. City of Red Wing 831 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2013
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 830 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 2013
In re the Welfare of J.J.P. 831 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 2013
In re the Welfare of J.J.P. 831 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 2013
Minn. Const, art. Ill, § 1; -65 (Minn.2010).
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 830 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 2013
“We determine legislative intent primarily from the language of the statute itself.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re S.G. 828 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2013
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, VIN 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH 821 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2012
Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, VIN 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH 821 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
The goal of all statutory interpretation is to “ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.” Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2010)
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by