Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc., 792 N.W.2d 103.
-
Vyacheslav Mostov v. Nextten Stauer, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“This court will not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc., d 103, 104 (Minn. App. 2010).
- Noelle Erling v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
Noelle Erling v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Anne L Doering v. 2Care4U South, LLC, 4U Home Health Care South, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic …
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Mary Chasteen v. Ind School District #2342, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
- Elizabeth Young v. Coborn’s Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Elizabeth Young v. Coborn’s Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We will “not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Lynn M. Langer v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Billie Edmonds v. Intermediate School District #917, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc., (stating that we do “not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion”).
-
Justin McDuff v. Half Moon Clippers, LLC - Great Clips, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
This court will “not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentia ry hearing unless the decisi on constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Jean-Yves Viardin v. Eclipse Select MN LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We will “not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Troy Gates v. Advanced Web Technologies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We will “not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional eviden tiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Edward Curtis, Jr. v. ARG Resources LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Eric Robert Mitzuk v. Davlyn Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Daniel Carson v. PACT Charter School, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Sokkhan Ka v. Lonvigson’s Service Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“This court will not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
-
Amber McCorison v. Pizza Luce III, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
This court does not “reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an addit ional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc., (Minn. App .
-
Dawn Johnson v. Dakota County Receiving Center, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
- Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc., Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs.
- Nikita Seras-Nachole Cordes v. Heartland Midwest, LLC - Burger King, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Nikita Seras-Nachole Cordes v. Heartland Midwest, LLC - Burger King, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“This court will not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
- Pamela Beidel v. Corporate Commission of Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians - Grand Casino Hinckley, Department of … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Pamela Beidel v. Corporate Commission of Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians - Grand Casino Hinckley, Department of …
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“This court will not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
- Monica Peterson v. A-Z Friendly Languages, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Monica Peterson v. A-Z Friendly Languages, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We defer to a ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional evidentiary hearing, Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., and we will reverse that decision only when the ULJ abuses his discretion, Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
- Michael Robin v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Michael Robin v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“This court will not reverse a ULJ’s decision to deny an additional evidentiary hearing unless the decision constitutes an abuse of discretion.” Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc.
- Eley v. Southshore Investments, Inc. 845 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Eley v. Southshore Investments, Inc.
845 N.W.2d 216
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cf. Kelly v. Ambassador Press, Inc., (“Insufficient notice of an appeal hearing under Minn.Stat.