Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp., 816 N.W.2d 572.

56 citing documents.

Josh Campion, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“If no 9 duty exists, it is error for the district court to submit [a] negligence claim to the jury.”
Emily Pedersen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
This is because, “[w]here a party cannot prove that the duty at issue arose independent of a contract, Minnesota law precludes that party from recovering in negligence based [on] breach of that duty.” (quotation omitted).
David Schindele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“[A] party is not responsible for damages in tort if the duty breached was merely imposed by contract and not imposed by law.” (quotations omitted).
Michelin Properties LLC, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
11 On appeal, respondents argue that “[a]ny duty resulting from a contractual relationship is a duty based only on the terms of the contract.”
Suzanne Krupp, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp. , ; Rinn v. Minn. State Agr ic.
Isaac C. Johnson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
LeAnn Wilbourn, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Duty is a threshold question because a defendant cannot breach a nonexistent duty.” (quotation omitted).
Distinguished Village Homes of Grandview Square II Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co. v. Butler , d 572 (Minn. 2012).
Andrew Geist, individually and as parent and natural guardian of minor, T.G., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
imposed by contract, and not imposed by law.” (quotations omitted).
Ashen S. Diehl, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Products liability can be based on a theory of negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty.” (quotation omitted) (emphasis added).
East View Information Services, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. v. Butler , d 156, 158 (Minn. App. 1984); (providing that “when a contract provides the only source of duties between the parties, Minnesota law does not permit the breach of those duties to support a cause of action in negligence.” (quotation omitted)).
Alicia A. Oldenhof, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In general, a claim of common-law negligence requires a party to show “(1) the existence of a duty of care, (2) a breach of that duty, (3) an injury, and (4) that the breach of the duty of care was a proximate cause of the injury .” Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp. , -82 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted) ; ( stating elements of negligence claim in dog -bite case).
Mark Kedrowski, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jerry’s Enters., Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. , (quotation omitted); d 17 541, 549 (Minn. App. 2011), aff’d
Jeffrey Paul Hofmann, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp.
James Linn v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Linn v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that a party is not responsible for tort damages for breach of a contractual duty).
Frankie R. Christy v. Rottinghaus Company, Inc., d/b/a Subway, Rottinghaus Real Estate, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Frankie R. Christy v. Rottinghaus Company, Inc., d/b/a Subway, Rottinghaus Real Estate, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jean A. Swanson v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jean A. Swanson v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jerry’s Enters., Inc., v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., Appellate courts “apply de novo review to the district court’s denial of a [r]ule 50 motion.” aff’d
Scott B. Lindholm v. Carleton College, and third party v. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, third-party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Scott B. Lindholm v. Carleton College, and third party v. Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors, third-party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Roxanne J. Soderholm v. Olivia Forar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Roxanne J. Soderholm v. Olivia Forar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nereus Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc., d/b/a Bright Technologies, and third party v. VZ Hogs, LLP, Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nereus Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc., d/b/a Bright Technologies, and third party v. VZ Hogs, LLP, Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 572, 581 (Minn. 2012).
Negassi H. Ghebrehiwet v. Khaled Ghneim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Negassi H. Ghebrehiwet v. Khaled Ghneim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[A] party is not responsible for damages in tort if the duty breached was merely imposed by contract.” (quotations omitted).
Karla Kay Edenloff v. Maxistorage, LLC, a/k/a Maxistorage 1801, LLC, Maxistorage 1807, LLC and Maxistorage 1711, LLC d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Karla Kay Edenloff v. Maxistorage, LLC, a/k/a Maxistorage 1801, LLC, Maxistorage 1807, LLC and Maxistorage 1711, LLC d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners' Association, and third party v. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners' Association, and third party v. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that, in a case where sales contract created duty to provide flight lessons, party was precluded from recovering in tort for breach of that duty because “[w]here a party cannot prove that the duty at issue arose independent of a contract, Minnesota law precludes that party from recovering in
James P. Thommes v. Honeywell International, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James P. Thommes v. Honeywell International, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(quotation omitted), aff’d
Fred Newell v. Timothy Eide, and third party v. Norcostco, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Fred Newell v. Timothy Eide, and third party v. Norcostco, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Martin L. Harris v. Lang Nelson Associates, Inc. d/b/a Creekside Gables Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Martin L. Harris v. Lang Nelson Associates, Inc. d/b/a Creekside Gables Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Duty is a threshold question because a defendant cannot breach a nonexistent duty.” (quotation omitted).
The Bank of New York Mellon, for the certificateholders of CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2005-6CB, Mortgage Pass-through … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Bank of New York Mellon, for the certificateholders of CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2005-6CB, Mortgage Pass-through … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 541, 557 (Minn. App. 2011), aff’d
Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336, ); aff’d (Minn. Jul.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Historic Ivy Tower, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Catlin Underwriting Agencies, Ltd. v. ALLETE, Inc., d/b/a Minnesota Power, Schneider Electric USA, Inc., f/k/a Square D Company, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Historic Ivy Tower, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ivy parties are precluded from recovering on that basis because “negligent breach of contract[ is] a cause of action not recognized in this state.” (); (“[W]hen a contract provides the only source of duties between the parties, Minnesota law does not permit the breach of those duties to support a cause of action in negligence.” (quotation omitted) (citing Lesmeister, d at 102)); Wild v. Rarig, 302 Minn. 419, 440, (197
Catlin Underwriting Agencies, Ltd. v. ALLETE, Inc., d/b/a Minnesota Power, Schneider Electric USA, Inc., f/k/a Square D Company, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier Company 848 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2014
See, (holding that a plaintiff may not recover in tort when the duty owed was imposed only by contract).
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(“The task of extending existing law falls to the supreme court or the legislature, but it does not fall to this court.” (quotation omitted)), aff 'd