Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bobo v. State, 820 N.W.2d 511.

135 citing documents.

Overruled Rufus Cornelius Loyd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Bobo v. State , (“An evidentiary hearing provides the postconviction court the means of evaluating the credibility of a witness.”).
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
See, e.g. , Henderson v. State , , 507 (Minn. 2018) ; Caldwell v. State , , 772-73 (Minn. 2014) ; Bobo v. State , , 517 n.4 (Minn. 2012) ; Ferguson v. State , , 560 (Minn. 2010) ; State v. Turnage , , 597-98 (Minn. 2007).
Taylor v. State 910 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 2018
Taylor v. State 910 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 2018
Bobo v. State , , 516 (Minn. 2012) ("Any doubts about whether to conduct an evidentiary hearing should be resolved in favor of the defendant.").
Jermaine Sylvester Watkins, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. M. W. and H. E. P., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
An evidentiary hearing is appropriate if the motion “allege[s] facts that, if proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence, would satisfy the two-prong [ Strickland test].”
Keith Henderson, Minn. 2018
See, e.g., Bobo v. State , (“An evidentiary hearing provides the postconviction court the means for evaluating the credibility of a witness.” (citations omitted)); (“[A]bsent a[n evidentiary] hearing, the postconviction court cannot make a judgment about which story is tr
Hassan Mohamed Abdillahi, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Zornes v. State 903 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2017
Zornes v. State 903 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 (1984); Bobo v. State
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
A16-0648 Minn. 2017
Erasmo Monge Rauda, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Mosley 895 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2017
State v. Mosley 895 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2017
A postconviction court need not hold an evidentiary hearing when a petitioner “alleges facts that, if true, are legally insufficient to entitle him to the requested relief.” ().
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
While our supreme court has held that “a postconviction court should not make witness- credibility determinations without first holding an evidentiary hearing,” n.4 (Minn. 2012) (), this court has repeatedly affirmed denials of postconviction relief by relying on the record, including the plea-hearing transcript, in cases where an appellant asserts that his or her plea was unintelligent due to being under the inf
Pearson v. State 891 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2017
Pearson v. State 891 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2017
see Minn. Stat. § 590.04 , subd.
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Brian Keith Hooper v. State of Minnesota 888 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 2016
Brian Keith Hooper v. State of Minnesota 888 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael David Kochevar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael David Kochevar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The postconviction court may refuse to hold an evidentiary hearing when a petitioner “alleges facts that, if true, are legally insufficient to entitle him to the requested relief.” d 511, 517 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted).
Kim Thul Ouk v. State of Minnesota 884 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 2016
Kim Thul Ouk v. State of Minnesota 884 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 2016
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016
Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Francis Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Francis Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560 875 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2016
Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560 875 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2016
The legal standard required to obtain an evidentiary hearing “is lower than that required for a new trial.”
State of Minnesota v. Wendell Anthony Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wendell Anthony Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A petitioner asserting an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim should be granted an evidentiary hearing if the 10 petitioner has “allege[d] facts that, if proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence, would satisfy the two-prong [Strickland] test.” see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064, 2068 (1984).
Hassan Mohamed Abdillahi v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hassan Mohamed Abdillahi v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kodjo Agbelengeor Anyide-Ocloo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kodjo Agbelengeor Anyide-Ocloo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerome Avriell Smith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerome Avriell Smith v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nissalke v. State 861 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 2015