Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Phipps, 820 N.W.2d 282.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of immediate proximity,’ or 6 ‘[c]onnection or interaction; communication.’” (quoting The American Heritage College Dictionary 299 (3d ed. 2000)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. M. G., I. E. F., J. P., … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Contact” is defined as “‘[a] coming together or touching, as of objects or surfaces,’ ‘[t]he state or condition of touching 8 or of immediate proximity,’ or ‘[c]onnection or interaction; communication.’” (alteration in original) (quoting The American Heritage College Dictionary 299 (3d ed. 2000)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“The phrase ‘no contact’ is clear and understandable.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In State v. Phipps , we concluded that “[t]he phrase ‘no contact’ is clear and understandable.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“It is well established that the right to due process includes the right to not be convicted and punished based on an unconstitutionally vague statute.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[T]he right to due process includes the right to not be convicted and punished based on an unconstitutionally vague statute.”
Tara Ann Nesmoe-Thompson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This court has held that “contact,” when used in a no-contact order, is plainly understandable, meaning “coming together or touching, as of objects or surfaces,” “[t]he state or condition of touching or of immediate proximity,” or “[c]onnection or inter action; communication.” State v. Phipps , (alternations in original) (quoting The American Heritage College Dictionary 299 (3d ed. 2000)).
State of Minnesota v. Kim Marie Halvorson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kim Marie Halvorson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(applying the void-for-vagueness doctrine to an order for protection).
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“It is well established that the right to due process includes the right to not be convicted and punished based on an unconstitutionally vague statute.”
State of Minnesota v. Momat Ali Jagne Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Momat Ali Jagne Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellant relies on State v. Phipps, in which this court determined that a “no contact” provision was not unconstitutionally 4 vague on its face and defined “contact” as: “a coming together or touching, as of objects or surfaces, the state or condition of touching or of immediate proximity, or connection or interaction; communication.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Lori Elaine Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lori Elaine Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the context of an HRO or order for protection, “contact” with another person means “‘[a] coming together or touching, as of objects or surfaces,’ ‘[t]he state or 7 condition of touching or of immediate proximity,’ or ‘[c]onnection or interaction; communication.’” (quoting The American Heritage College Dictionary 299 (3d ed. 2000)).
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 829 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 829 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“[T]he right to due process includes the right to not be convicted and punished based on an unconstitutionally vague statute.”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by