Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. State, 818 N.W.2d 557.

16 citing documents.

A24-1454 A24-1455 A24-1700 A24-1741 A24-1750 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But “it is an extraordinarily rare case in which the equitable remedy of 33 promissory estoppel should preclude state action.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, 570 (Minn. App. 2012).
Aaron Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
P. 20.01.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The promise must be such that it might reasonably induce the promisee’s action or inaction.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (quotation omitted).
Spring Grove Township, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., ; see also Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Jade Joseph Nickels, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Promissory estoppel “may be applied against the state to the extent that justice requires.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Estate of: Stephen D. King, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, LLC v. State , (“An 4 Cohan argues that, because this case arises from the district court’s order granting a motion to dismiss under Minn. R. Civ.
James R. Pavelka, Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Whether undisputed facts “rise to the level of promissory est oppel presents a question of law.” Martens, d at 746; see also Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (stating that “[w]hether promissory estoppel applies is a question of law”).
Martin Matthew Lange, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
may be applied against the state to the extent that justice requires.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, L (quotation omitted).
Old Republic Surety Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber
Beverly Waldorf Tokarz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Beverly Waldorf Tokarz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cf. Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, –63, 573 (Minn. App. 2012) (questioning whether state was proper party to action against “various State of Minnesota officials and entities,” 5 including commissioner of revenue, and noting that “the state can provide no relief other than that provided by the commi
County of Aitkin, relators v. Blandin Paper Company 883 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 2016
See generally Meriweather Minn. Land & Timber, -62 (Minn. App. 2012) (explaining the SFIA program and statutory changes).
Kimberly-Clark Corporation & Subsidiaries, Relators/Cross-Respondents v. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. 880 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 2016
Kimberly-Clark Corporation & Subsidiaries, Relators/Cross-Respondents v. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. 880 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 2016
Bergin v. Washburn, 224 Minn. 269, 273, see also Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (stating, in rejecting claims for breach of contract and unconstitutional impairment of contract, that “any promise to be found in a statute is inherently limited by the legislature’s power to amend a statute”); Anderson, d at 80 (rejecting a Contract Clause challenge to the repeal o