Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. State, 818 N.W.2d 557.

17 citing documents.

Minnesota Duty Disabled Association (MNDDA), a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. State of Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A contractual obligation may be created by a state statute when the language and circumstances evince a legislative intent to create private rights of a contractual nature enforceable against the State.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sep.
A24-1455 A24-1700 A24-1741 A24-1750 In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But “it is an extraordinarily rare case in which the equitable remedy of 33 promissory estoppel should preclude state action.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber
State of Minnesota v. Antoine Kenneth James Adkins Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, 570 (Minn. App. 2012).
Aaron Olson v. Community Action Partnership of Hennepin County (CAPSH), State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
P. 20.01.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and Sveindis Charais, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and Sveindis Charais, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The promise must be such that it might reasonably induce the promisee’s action or inaction.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (quotation omitted).
Spring Grove Township v. Brian Myrah, Karen Fried, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., ; see also Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Jade Joseph Nickels v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Promissory estoppel “may be applied against the state to the extent that justice requires.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Estate of: Stephen D. King, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, LLC v. State , (“An 4 Cohan argues that, because this case arises from the district court’s order granting a motion to dismiss under Minn. R. Civ.
James R. Pavelka, Jr. v. Heather Shadursky Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Whether undisputed facts “rise to the level of promissory est oppel presents a question of law.” Martens, d at 746; see also Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (stating that “[w]hether promissory estoppel applies is a question of law”).
Martin Matthew Lange v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minn. Ct. App. 2022
may be applied against the state to the extent that justice requires.” Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, L (quotation omitted).
Old Republic Surety Company v. Weinerman and Associates LLC, Mark Bugni, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber
Beverly Waldorf Tokarz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Beverly Waldorf Tokarz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cf. Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, –63, 573 (Minn. App. 2012) (questioning whether state was proper party to action against “various State of Minnesota officials and entities,” 5 including commissioner of revenue, and noting that “the state can provide no relief other than that provided by the commi
County of Aitkin, relators v. Blandin Paper Company 883 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 2016
See generally Meriweather Minn. Land & Timber, -62 (Minn. App. 2012) (explaining the SFIA program and statutory changes).
Kimberly-Clark Corporation & Subsidiaries, Relators/Cross-Respondents v. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. 880 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 2016
Kimberly-Clark Corporation & Subsidiaries, Relators/Cross-Respondents v. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. 880 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 2016
Bergin v. Washburn, 224 Minn. 269, 273, see also Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, (stating, in rejecting claims for breach of contract and unconstitutional impairment of contract, that “any promise to be found in a statute is inherently limited by the legislature’s power to amend a statute”); Anderson, d at 80 (rejecting a Contract Clause challenge to the repeal o