DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thao v. Command Center, Inc., 824 N.W.2d 1.

19 citing documents.

Dorothy L. Henschel v. MJ Business Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
While the applicant’s reason for quitting is a question of fact, see Beyer v. Heavy Duty Air, Inc., -82 (Minn. App. 1986), whether that reason constituted good cause to quit is a question of law that we review de novo, see Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Vyacheslav Mostov v. Nextten Stauer, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Tamer K. Embaby v. Department of Treasury, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Tamer K. Embaby v. Department of Treasury, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Teresa McDonald v. Monarch Bus Service, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Robert Salvaggio v. Prominent Technology, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Jeffrey Zoss v. Collibra, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Naomi Campbell v. Minnesota Adult and Teen Challenge, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Anne L Doering v. 2Care4U South, LLC, 4U Home Health Care South, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc., d 1, 4 (Minn. App. 2012).
Mary Chasteen v. Ind School District #2342, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Interplastic Corporation v. Kevin Rausch, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Michael Noel v. Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Generally, a substantial pay reduction gives an employee good cause for quitting.” Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Robert Welch v. Twin Express, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Ann R. Majerus v. Spartannash Associates, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Specifically , she relies on Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc. , Sunstar Foods Inc. v. Uhlendorf , ; Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, and Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., .
Terrance Simon v. Launch Technical Workforce Solutions, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The determination that an employee quit without good reason attributable to the employer is a legal conclusion, which this court reviews de novo.” Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Wajiha Shirin Shah v. IMI’s MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Wajiha Shirin Shah v. IMI’s MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc.
Tamara S. Jamnick v. Range Mental Health Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Tamara S. Jamnick v. Range Mental Health Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
And although “[g]enerally, a substantial pay reduction gives an employee good cause for quitting,” Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc., 5 (Minn. App. 2012) (quotation omitted), any reduction in Jamnick’s hours and associated compensation was speculative when Jamnick quit.