Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kremer v. Kremer, 827 N.W.2d 454.

17 citing documents.

In Re the Custody of BJS: Joseph Stanton v. Amber Lee Finley, County of Fillmore Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Appellate review of custody determinations is limited to whether the district court abused its discretion by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the marriage of: Erica Faith Haines v. Joshua Isaac Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Appellate review of custody determinations is limited to whether the district court abused its discretion by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In Re the Custody of: A.L., Ian Larsen v. Sian Minske Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(rejecting similar argument on ground that “district court made particularized findings that encompassed each factor”), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag v. David Alan Slag Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Sefkow, d at 210; (applying this deference to a district court’s decision to credit the testimony and report of an expert), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Amy Joy Kemp v. Michael Edward Kemp Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that “although the district court did not specifically address the effect of mother’s relocation .
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Ann Kuchera v. Joel Wayne Biebighauser, County of Dakota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
15 other children does not support a conclusion that the district court erred when it found that the child would benefit from “maximizing parenting time with both parents” and the continued “opportunity to maintain close relationships with the significant people in her life.” The findings here are similar to the findings reviewed in Kremer v. Kremer , , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Michael Anthony Guardia v. Jennifer Marie Mattson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Kremer v. Kremer , (stating that it “was within the district court’s discretion to rely on [a] custody evaluator’s testimony and report” and deferring to the district court’s credibility determinati on regarding that evidence), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Kristy Ann Ryan v. Jeffrey Alan Ryan Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Our “ review of custody determinations is limited to whether the [district] court abused its discretion by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re: Guardianship of Matthew Lee Johnson, Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-58 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Alexander K. Antzaras v. Triantafilia Rose Moshou-Antzaras Minn. Ct. App. 2017
And we “defer to the district court’s credibility determinations.” 58 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Scott Hoover v. Kelly Jane Hoover Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“We view the record in the light most favor able to the district court’s findings and defer to the district court’ s credibility determinations.” In re Kremer v. Kremer , –58 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A finding is clearly erroneous if this court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” review denied (Minn. Apr.