Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kremer v. Kremer, 827 N.W.2d 454.

16 citing documents.

In re the marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“Appellate review of custody determinations is limited to whether the district court abused its discretion by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In Re the Custody of: A.L., Ian Larsen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(rejecting similar argument on ground that “district court made particularized findings that encompassed each factor”), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Sefkow, d at 210; (applying this deference to a district court’s decision to credit the testimony and report of an expert), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Amy Joy Kemp, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that “although the district court did not specifically address the effect of mother’s relocation .
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Ann Kuchera, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
15 other children does not support a conclusion that the district court erred when it found that the child would benefit from “maximizing parenting time with both parents” and the continued “opportunity to maintain close relationships with the significant people in her life.” The findings here are similar to the findings reviewed in Kremer v. Kremer , , rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
Michael Anthony Guardia, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Kremer v. Kremer , (stating that it “was within the district court’s discretion to rely on [a] custody evaluator’s testimony and report” and deferring to the district court’s credibility determinati on regarding that evidence), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Kristy Ann Ryan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Our “ review of custody determinations is limited to whether the [district] court abused its discretion by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re: Guardianship of Matthew Lee Johnson, Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-58 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Apr.
A17-0300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
And we “defer to the district court’s credibility determinations.” 58 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“We view the record in the light most favor able to the district court’s findings and defer to the district court’ s credibility determinations.” In re Kremer v. Kremer , –58 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A finding is clearly erroneous if this court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” review denied (Minn. Apr.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by