DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co., 845 N.W.2d 808.

42 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Rosemary Christine Forschen King v. Alexander James King Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Stevie Ray Samaniego Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Swanson v. 3M Co., n.3 (Minn. 2014), they may “provide[] guidance” as we interpret and apply the Rules, In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 39302
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Richard Wiley Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance New Certificate of Title After Mortgage Foreclosure Sale Certificate No. 112938 – ... Minn. 2026
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance New Certificate of Title After Mortgage Foreclosure Sale Certificate No. 112938 – ... Minn. 2026
Peter Richard Rickmyer v. Xenos Letoi Brooks Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Matter of: Anthony Michael Kautz v. Sarah Beth Moore, Susan and Randy Kautz, Sherri Kerpan, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. R.R.M., see also State by Swanson v. 3M Co.
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2025
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2025
Swanson v. 3M Co., ( n.9 (Minn. 2002)) (“When our jurisprudence is undeveloped in an area, as it is here, we often consider case law from other jurisdictions for guidance.”).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Sean Anthony Porter Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts “review the district court’s decision regarding disqualification of counsel for an abuse of discretion.” State by Swanson v. 3M Co., -17 (Minn. 2014) (applying the abuse-of-discretion standard of review to a district court’s decision about a law firm’s conflict of interest).
Gracelyn Trimble v. Dalvin Cook, Daniel Cragg, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State by Swanson v. 3M Co.
In the Matter of: Tessa Mortenson v. Action for East African People, Employer, Debra Hilstrom, Department of Employment … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Northern Metals, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, et al., Crow Wing Recycling, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Northern Metals, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, et al., Crow Wing Recycling, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Swanson v. 3M Co., see also Minn. R. Civ.
Dr. Jane Doe, et al v. Governor of Minnesota, et al., Mothers Offering Maternal Support Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Swanson v. 3M Co., d 808, 814 (Minn. 2014) (stating that “[a]n appellant has standing to appeal if the appellant is an aggrieved party” and noting that “[an] appellant’s status as an aggrieved party depends on whether there is injury to a legally protected right” (quotations omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Matthew Beland, et al v. Heidi Beland NKA Heidi Rylander, Polk County Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Matthew James Beland (A22-1468) v. Kurtis Rylander, Kurtis Rylander, vs. Matthew Beland (A22-1469) Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kristen Glaros Hanson, et al., Midwest Investment Services, LLC v. CBS Construction Services, Inc., et al., Brandon M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kristen Glaros Hanson, et al., Midwest Investment Services, LLC v. CBS Construction Services, Inc., et al., Brandon M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Swanson v. 3M Co., 19 (Minn. 2014); Prod.
State of Minnesota v. G. R. K Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bonnie Berthiaume, et al., Robert Berthiaume, et al v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, Imeriti, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Swanson v. 3M Co. , (determining that the district court did not consider “all legally relevant factors” under the correct legal standard fo r attorney disqualification).
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Anthony Cruz Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Olimpia Onofre Cedillo, et al v. Herbert Azubuike Igbanugo, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
Swanson v. 3M Co. , , 821 (Minn. 2014).
In re the Guardianship of Daniel J. Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Fardowsa Mohamed, DBA Hope Alliance Health Care, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re: Sidney A. Goodman Revocable Trust, U/A/D December 16, 1985 as Amended Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Swanson v. 3M Co., (quotations omitted).
Renee Wiskow, et al v. Zachary O’Reilly Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Swanson v. 3M Co. , (“[An appellate court’s] ability to engage in effective appellate review of the exercise of .
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
Viele Contracting, Inc. v. Performance Pipelining, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Viele Contracting, Inc. v. Performance Pipelining, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An abuse of discretion occurs when a district court “bases its decision on an erroneous view of the law or when it renders a decision that is contrary to the facts in the record.” State by Swanson v. 3M Co.
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Swanson v. 3M Co., 10 (Minn. 2014) (“A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its decision on an erroneous view of the law or when it renders a decision that is contrary to the facts in the record.”).
Timothy T. Childs, et al v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy T. Childs, et al v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Nicholas Aase Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Nicholas Aase Minn. Ct. App. 2015
1; see State v. 3M Co., -18 (Minn. 2014) (in discussing a waiver of conflict of interest, the court emphasized the need to “‘uphold high ethical CS-1 standards in the legal profession’”).
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2014