Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co., 845 N.W.2d 808.

42 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Swanson v. 3M Co., n.3 (Minn. 2014), they may “provide[] guidance” as we interpret and apply the Rules, In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 39302
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance New Certificate of Title After Mortgage Foreclosure Sale Certificate No. 112938 – ... Minn. 2026
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance New Certificate of Title After Mortgage Foreclosure Sale Certificate No. 112938 – ... Minn. 2026
Peter Richard Rickmyer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A25-0147 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. R.R.M., see also State by Swanson v. 3M Co.
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2025
E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2025
Swanson v. 3M Co., ( n.9 (Minn. 2002)) (“When our jurisprudence is undeveloped in an area, as it is here, we often consider case law from other jurisdictions for guidance.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts “review the district court’s decision regarding disqualification of counsel for an abuse of discretion.” State by Swanson v. 3M Co., -17 (Minn. 2014) (applying the abuse-of-discretion standard of review to a district court’s decision about a law firm’s conflict of interest).
A24-0831 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State by Swanson v. 3M Co.
In the Matter of: Tessa Mortenson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Northern Metals, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Crow Wing Recycling, Inc.,... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Northern Metals, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Crow Wing Recycling, Inc.,... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Swanson v. 3M Co., see also Minn. R. Civ.
Dr. Jane Doe, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Swanson v. 3M Co., d 808, 814 (Minn. 2014) (stating that “[a]n appellant has standing to appeal if the appellant is an aggrieved party” and noting that “[an] appellant’s status as an aggrieved party depends on whether there is injury to a legally protected right” (quotations omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Matthew Beland, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A22-1469 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kristen Glaros Hanson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kristen Glaros Hanson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Swanson v. 3M Co., 19 (Minn. 2014); Prod.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bonnie Berthiaume, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Swanson v. 3M Co. , (determining that the district court did not consider “all legally relevant factors” under the correct legal standard fo r attorney disqualification).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Olimpia Onofre Cedillo, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
Swanson v. 3M Co. , , 821 (Minn. 2014).
In re the Guardianship of Daniel J. Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re: Sidney A. Goodman Revocable Trust, U/A/D December 16, 1985 as Amended Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Swanson v. 3M Co., (quotations omitted).
Renee Wiskow, et al., petitioners, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Swanson v. 3M Co. , (“[An appellate court’s] ability to engage in effective appellate review of the exercise of .
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
Viele Contracting, Inc. v. Performance Pipelining, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Viele Contracting, Inc. v. Performance Pipelining, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An abuse of discretion occurs when a district court “bases its decision on an erroneous view of the law or when it renders a decision that is contrary to the facts in the record.” State by Swanson v. 3M Co.
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Swanson v. 3M Co., 10 (Minn. 2014) (“A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its decision on an erroneous view of the law or when it renders a decision that is contrary to the facts in the record.”).
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Nicholas Aase Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Nicholas Aase Minn. Ct. App. 2015
1; see State v. 3M Co., -18 (Minn. 2014) (in discussing a waiver of conflict of interest, the court emphasized the need to “‘uphold high ethical CS-1 standards in the legal profession’”).
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014