Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Fiduciary Foundation, LLC v. Brown, 834 N.W.2d 756.

29 citing documents.

Anna Rae Dosso and On Behalf of Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 756, 761 (Minn. App. 2013) (“A proceeding is special, within the ordinary meaning of the term ‘special proceeding,’ when the law confers a right, and authorizes a special application to a court to enforce it.” (quotations omitted)), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Kryzta Ellyzabeth-Marie Martinez, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Toni Elizabeth Ickler Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Toni Elizabeth Ickler Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-61 (Minn. App. 2013) ().
Lindsay Allyn Yates Plumer v. Joseph Mark Plumer, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Lindsay Allyn Yates Plumer v. Joseph Mark Plumer, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“A proceeding is special, within the ordinary meaning of the term special proceeding, when the law confers a right, and authorizes a special application to a court to enforce it.” (quotations omitted)), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Todd Brian Kerber, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 756, 761 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Kristen M. Egan, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Courtney Ann Houck, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Tracy Nuthak, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Katherine Dillard Rice Hayes, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Thiele v. Stich , see also Fiduciary Found., (applying Thiele in an HRO appeal).
Breanna Marie Borth, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(invoking de novo review when construing Minn. Stat. § 609.748 (2012)), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Heather Mary Zigan, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(ap plying Thiele in an HRO appeal); see also Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., d 133, 135 (Minn. 1971) (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal
A20-1369 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
( “[W]hen no hearing is held because a respondent does not timely request a hearing, an ex parte [temporary HRO] .
Mitchell Wilfred Suess, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Rothfusz , review denied (Minn. Sept.
A20-0958 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
III, 2018 WL 3966223, at *3 (citing Fiduciary Found., ).
Linde Sayen, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
An HRO proceeding is not a typical civil matter, but a special proceeding that “confers a right upon an individual ” and authorizes a special application to a court to enforce it.” Fiduciary Found., review denied (Minn. Sept.
David Rucki, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Rothfusz v. Brown , 761 (Minn. App. 2013) (quoting Schuster v. Schuster, 84 Minn. 403, 407, 87 N.W.
In the Matter of Krista Ann Dickenson and o/b/o Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rothfusz v. Brown , d 756, 762 (Minn. App. 2013) (), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Fiduciary Foundation, review denied (Minn. Sept.
Lucas Heikkila, individually and o/b/o Minor Children v. Jeff Dietman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lucas Heikkila, individually and o/b/o Minor Children v. Jeff Dietman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(Minn. App. 2013) (quotations omitted) (finding the same for an ex parte HRO), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Sharon Anne Johnson v. Paul Jonathan Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sharon Anne Johnson v. Paul Jonathan Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Sept.
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Fiduciary Found., review denied (Minn. Sept.