Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Daniel Joseph Devens, 852 N.W.2d 255.

83 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Generally, the law require s a person to retreat “if reasonably possible before acting in self-defense.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[A] person may act in self-defense if he or she reasonably believes that force is necessary and uses only the level of force reasonably necessary to prevent the bodily harm feared.” State 5 v. Devens
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Hensel 901 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2017
State v. Pollard 900 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Pollard 900 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Devens , (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Mary Marie Garner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mary Marie Garner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
see also Minn. Stat. § 609.06, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Susan Patrice Long Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Susan Patrice Long Minn. Ct. App. 2016
5 A person may claim self-defense if the person “reasonably believes that force is necessary and uses only the level of force reasonably necessary to prevent the bodily harm feared.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert Michael Heath Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Michael Heath Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Amreya Rahmeto Shefa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Amreya Rahmeto Shefa Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott Jeffrey Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Doan Meshell Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Doan Meshell Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
District courts have “significant discretion to craft jury instructions.”
State of Minnesota v. Scott Jeffrey Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(d 281, 285-86 (Minn. 1997)).
State of Minnesota v. Christian Mccary Mayo Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christian Mccary Mayo Minn. Ct. App. 2016
District courts have broad discretion to craft jury instructions, but “a jury instruction is erroneous if it materially misstates the law.”
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Kenton Edmondson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Kenton Edmondson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 255, 259 (Minn. 2014) (stating the word “dwelling” within burglary statute’s definitional section is “broad enough to include an apartment hallway”).
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Both the use of force and the level of force must be reasonable.” n.5 (Minn. 2014) (citing Glowacki, d at 402).
State of Minnesota v. Undra Lewis Harrell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Undra Lewis Harrell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(requiring an “honest belief .
State of Minnesota v. Carl Antonio Wilks Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Carl Antonio Wilks Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that a person can use “only the level of force reasonably necessary to prevent the bodily harm feared”).
State of Minnesota v. Keith Dawson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Keith Dawson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We must consider whether the common hallway, elevator, and parking garage within the apartment complex are appurtenant to the individual apartment unit “buildings.” Dawson cites this court’s (Minn. App. Dec.