Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minke v. City of Minneapolis, 845 N.W.2d 179.

25 citing documents.

Kimberly Hamson, et al v. The Foothills Christian Academy Society of Backus, MN, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Tyler Timberlake v. Brian O’Hara (A24-1282) (A24-1331), City of Minneapolis (A24-1282) (A24-1331) Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Absolute privilege bars liability for even ‘intentionally false statements, coupled with malice,’ while qualified privilege bars liability only if the ‘defamatory statements are publicized in good faith and without malice.’” d 179, 182 (Minn. 2014) ().
Karen K. Osowski v. Edie Harer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[S]tatements made in particular contexts or on certain occasions should be encouraged despite the risk that the statements might be defamatory.” (quotation omitted).
Brent A. Ristow v. Amanda Cunningham Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Katie Aase v. Megan Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Steven Dahl v. Pamela Quinn Minn. Ct. App. 2020
But absolute privilege does not apply to “all speech by government employees related to their work.” Minke v. City of Minneapolis
Ryan Larson, Minn. 2020
Samuel Zean, Eunice Zean v. Mark Reveling, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc. 929 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2019
Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc. 929 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 2019
" Minke v. City of Minneapolis , , 182 (Minn. 2014) (quoting Matthis v. Kennedy , 243 Minn. 219 , , 416 (1954) ).
Samuel Zean v. Mary T. Inc., et al. Respondents Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ashlee Kay Sames v. Scott County, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Minke v. City of Minneapolis , , 182 (Minn. 2014).
Hollis J. Larson v. The Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Larson v. Gannett Co. 915 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Larson v. Gannett Co. 915 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Minke v. City of Minneapolis , , 182 (Minn. 2014).
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Buchanan, d at 738 (identifying circumstances tending to show malice); 9 (explaining that absolute and qualified privilege protect statements that society wants to encourage despite the risk that they might be defamatory).
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services 883 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2016
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services 883 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2016
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of the U.S.
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al 862 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services, et al 862 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sheryl V. Mooers v. City of Lake City, Minnesota, et al., Karen England, individually Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sheryl V. Mooers v. City of Lake City, Minnesota, et al., Karen England, individually Minn. Ct. App. 2014