Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc., 868 N.W.2d 655.

78 citing documents.

Jacob R. Taylor, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Ann Kortas, a/k/a Margaret A. Kortas, a/k/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Edward B. Berkner, Trustee of Berkner Living Trust, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Rochester City Lines
Doe A.S., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Rochester City Lines
Rick Stevens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
and resolve[s] all doubts and factual inferences against the moving part[y].” Rochester City Lines
Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 601, Appellants, vs. … Minn. 2025
Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 601, Appellants, vs. … Minn. 2025
At the summary judgment stage in the proceedings, we must view the evidence presented “in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party” and “resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Rochester City Lines
Michael Walker, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Provision Media, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Indeed, the best-value approach in selecting a bid is a recognized procedure “by which the award of a government contract depends on which proposal represents the best value based on an analysis of the tradeoff of qualitative technical factors and price or cost factors.” Rochester City Lines, (quotations omitted).
Joseph J. Walters, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
and resolve[s] all doubts and factual inferences against the moving part[y].” Rochester City Lines
Travis J Maahs, a Minnesota resident, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
6 and factual inferences against the moving part[y].” Rochester City Lines
Ana Thompson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving part[y].” Rochester City Lines
A19-0118 A19-0124 A20-1271 A20-1380 A20-1385 Minn. 2023
Rochester City Lines, (addressing procedural irregularities in a municipal bidding process).
Ronald G. Davis, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger F. Davis and Trustee of the Toivo W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Rochester City Lines
In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Death Benefit for Jerome Richard Lannon (deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The department argues only that he was not “killed in the line of duty.” 7 A material fact is one that “will affect the outcome of a case.” Rochester City Lines, (quotation omitted).
Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Dissenting as to Part I, Anderson, J., David Smits, as Trustee for the … Minn. 2022
and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Rochester City Lines
Under the Rainbow Early Education Center, Minn. 2022
We must view the evidence presented “in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party” and must “resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Rochester City Lines
In re: Determination of Need for Environmental Impact Statement for Pavilion Estates Subdivision Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. City of Rochester , relators argue that the township was unacceptabl y biased in favor of the development.
Eric Reetz, Minn. 2021
of Wash., d at 541; Rochester City Lines, d 655, 662–63 (Minn. 2015).
Daniel Ashbach, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A fact is material if its resolution wi ll affect the outcome of a case.” Rochester City Lines, (quotation omitted).
Minnesota Sands, LLC, Minn. 2020
ANALYSIS Because the case comes to us on the district court’s order granting summary judgment, we review that decision “de novo to determine (1) whether there are any genuine issues of material fact, and (2) whether the district court correctly applied the law.” Rochester City Lines
Michelle Friesen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
and resolve 4 all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Rochester City Lines
A19-0155 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
8 and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving part[y].” Rochester City Lines
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
Warren v. Dinter 926 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2019
" Fenrich v. Blake School , , 201 (Minn. 2018) (quoting Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester , , 661 (Minn. 2015) ).
Martin T. Breaker, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving part[y].” Rochester City Lines
Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. v. Chippewa/Swift Joint Bd. of Commissioners 925 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 2019
Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. v. Chippewa/Swift Joint Bd. of Commissioners 925 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 2019
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester , , 663 (Minn. 2015).
Richard R. Ryan, Trustee for the Next-of-Kin of Debra Lynn Ryan, Decedent for Action for Death by Wrongful … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving parties.” Rochester City Lines
Carol Vanerka Stephens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
6 part[y].” Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis 923 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2019
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis 923 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2019
See Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester , , 661 (Minn. 2015).
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC 922 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2019
Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC 922 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2019
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester , , 661 (Minn. 2015).
Generations Law Office, Ltd., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that the use of the words “hostage,” “ransom,” “extortion,” “robbery,” and “stole” was opinion and hyperbole—not a verifiable factual criminal accusation —because of the informal context in which the words were used), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester , , 661 (Minn. 2015).
Rochester City Lines Co., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 (Minn. App. 2014) (concluding in relevant part that “RCL has failed to present sufficient evidence for a reasonable fact -finder to conclude that the bid process and award violated the principles of competitive bidding”) aff’d in part, rev’d in part, and remanded , cert.
Said Ahmed Nur, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester 913 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 2018
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester 913 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 2018
After the contract was awarded to First Transit, RCL challenged the City's competitive bidding process, which we addressed in Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester ( RCL I ), cert.
Red Cross Construction, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Christensen Law Office, PLLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Commercial Dog or Cat Breeder License Issued to Deborah Rowell for Country Pride Kennel Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“[Q]uasi-judicial decisions share three characteristics: (1) an investigation into a disputed claim and the weighing of evidentiary facts; (2) the application of those facts to a prescribed standard; and (3) a binding decision regarding a disputed claim.” Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester
James A. Compart, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2d 398, 401 (Minn. 1995), and resolve all doubts and factual inferences against the moving party, Rochester City Lines
Paul Allen Bray, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester
Appeal of Krenik 903 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 2017
Appeal of Krenik 903 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 2017
In general, we have described a local governmental entity’s decision as arbitrary and capricious if it reflects its will rather than its judgment, Rochester City Lines, or when a decision is “based on whim or is devoid of articulated reasons,” Mammenga v. State Dep’t of Human Servs.
Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223 , see also Rochester City Lines, (holding that the evidence is viewed “in the light ¡most favorable to the nonmov-ing party” and all doubts are resolved against the moving party).
Randall v. Paul 897 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2017