Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lo…, 870 N.W.2d 755.

46 citing documents.

Jeffrey H Landon, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
& Lori Peterson L. Firm, aff’d
Range Cornice & Roofing Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Attorney’s Fees, aff’d
Mark Lukens, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ritalka, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
& Lori Peterson L. Firm, aff’d
Groebner and Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Attorney’s Fees, , aff’d
Doe 596, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
& Lori Peterson L. Firm, aff’d
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
of Att’y Fees between Stowman Law Firm, & Lori Peterson Law Firm, aff’d
Elfi E Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg P. A., Sibley ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Elfi E Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg P. A., Sibley ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
& Lori Peterson Law Firm, (quotation omitted), aff’d
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Of Attorney’s Fees, (reviewing a district court decision following a bench trial).
RCS-RCA Oak Ridge, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
& Lori Peterson Law Firm , aff’d
Smart Construction & Remodeling, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See In re 21 Petition for Distribution of Attorney’s Fees between Stowman L. Firm, P.A., d 755, 759 n.2 (Minn. 2015) (stating that quantum meruit is “a claim in equity as restitution for the value of a benefit conferred in the absence of a contract under a theory of unjust enrichment”); Banbury v. Omnitrition Int’l, Inc., (stating that “the doctrine of promissory estoppe
TestResources, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Elliott Sirota, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
& Lori Peterson Law Firm, aff’d
Ronald Hagle, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Richard W Bandimere, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Thomas M. Fafinski, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
& Lori Peterson Law Firm , aff’d
Faricy Law Firm, PA, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Al Dressely, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
& Lori Peterson Law Firm , , aff’d
Alissa Boehm, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
& Lori Peterson Law Firm, aff’d
O'Brien & Wolf, LLP v. S. Cent. Minn. Elec. Workers' Family Health Plan 923 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
O'Brien & Wolf, LLP v. S. Cent. Minn. Elec. Workers' Family Health Plan 923 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
759 (Minn. 2015) ("[A]n attorney's fee must be reasonable under the circumstances, even if contingent on the outcome."
Judy E. Adams, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& Lori Peterson Law Firm , aff’d .
Circle Reflection “J” Ranch, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& Lori Peterson Law Firm , (citations and quotations omitted), aff’d, d 755 (Minn. 2015).
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
Faricy Law Firm, P.A. v. API, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust 912 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 2018
761 (Minn. 2015) ; Lawler v. Dunn , 145 Minn. 281 , 176 N.W.
Glen M. Palecek, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& Lori Peterson Law Firm, aff’d, (Minn. Oct.
Nicole LaPoint, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney’s Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., (de novo review of legal conclusions after bench trial).
Souhsiung Jack Chiu, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& Lori Peterson Law Firm , (quotation and citations omitted), aff’d, d 755 (Minn. 2015).
Marshall Municipal Utilities, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Attorney’s Fees, (quotation omitted).
Sela Roofing and Remodeling, Inc., d/b/a as Sela Gutter Connection, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Attorney’s Fees, aff’d
Vene Lor, as conservator and natural mother of Ricky Yang, and Vene Lor, individually, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Chippewa Valley Ethanol Co. 897 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Chippewa Valley Ethanol Co. 897 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Attorney’s Fees, aff'd
Kristin M. Schumacher, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Attorney’s Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., & Lori Peterson Law Firm
WAF-2, LLC v. Lowry Building, LLC, and third party v. John R. Rupp, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
WAF-2, LLC v. Lowry Building, LLC, and third party v. John R. Rupp, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Attorney’s Fees between Stowman Law Firm & Lori Peterson Law Firm, aff’d (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of HIBBING TACONITE MINE AND STOCKPILE PROGRESSION and Williams Creek Project Specific Wetland Mitigation 888 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of HIBBING TACONITE MINE AND STOCKPILE PROGRESSION and Williams Creek Project Specific Wetland Mitigation 888 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We “must read and interpret contracts, like statutes, as a whole, not as separate isolated provisions.” In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney’s Fees
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016
Christopher C. Mogren v. Gregory Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Christopher C. Mogren v. Gregory Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Attorney’s Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., & Lori Peterson Law Firm, (quotation omitted), aff’d