Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson, 889 N.W.2d 279.

14 citing documents.

Court of Appeals Bryce Holstad, et al v. Town of May Hennesy, J. Concurring in part, dissenting in … Minn. 2026
See Expose v. Thad Wilderson & Assocs., P .A., (“[W]e must read this state’s laws as they are, not as some argue they 45 should be.”).
Laurissa Wredberg v. Canvas Health, Inc. Minn. 2026
(Expose II), as discussed below, we made no such pronouncement in that case.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. True Gravity Ventures, LLC, et al., Astra Genstar Partnership, LLP Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Expose v. Thad Wilderson & Assocs., PA, d 95, 101-02 (Minn. App. 2015), aff’d
Dametria White, et al., as co-trustees for the next-of-kin of Helayne Bass, deceased v. Park Nicollet Clinic Minn. Ct. App. 2026
P. 12.03; see also Expose v. Thad Wilderson & Assocs., P.A., & n.3 (Minn. 2016) (reviewing an order granting a rule 12.03 motion as one for summary judgment “because the district court relied on documents that were not part of the pleadings”).
Laurissa Wredberg v. Canvas Health, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1(k) (2020), cannot be pierced in criminal proceedings” (emphasis added)); Expose v. Thad Wilderson & Assocs ., P.A., , 283 (Minn. 2016) (explaining that “[t]he therapist-client privilege .
Justin Holtzbauer v. Allina Health System Minn. Ct. App. 2025
2(1); see also Expose v. Thad Wilderson & Assocs., P.A., (noting that Minn. Stat. § 144.298, subd.
Angie M. Barsness, et al v. Fairview Health Services Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Expose v. Thad Wilderson & Assocs., P.A., aff’d
Willow Run Partners v. Scott D. Hillstrom, et al., Michael W. Haag, et al., Paul Chamberlain, et al., … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Absolute privilege “shields a speaker from liability for statements made in judicial proceedings.” Expose v. Thad Wilderson & Assocs., P.A.
In re the Custody of: B. L. F., Cherries Chamberlain v. Neil Fleahman Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(quotation omitted), aff’d, .
Scott H. Lansing v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
we will treat the motions as motions for summary judgment.”), aff’d, ; Cent.
Christopher Christopherson v. Alpha Service Industries, Incorporated Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-03 (Minn. App. 2015), aff’d
McGuire v. Bowlin 932 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2019
McGuire v. Bowlin 932 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2019
Timothy J. Keane v. Ronald H. Groth, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Matthis, d at 419 (quoting Restatement (First) of Torts § 586 (1938)); see also Expose v. Thad Wilderson & Assocs., P.A., (noting that the absolute-privilege doctrine generally applies when the three Matthis requirements are met).