Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Maureen Ndidiamaka Onyelobi, 879 N.W.2d 334.

69 citing documents.

State v. Black 919 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Black 919 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Onyelobi , , 345 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jury instructions must “fairly and adequately explain the law of the case and not materially misstate the law.” Id.; (“A district court has broad discretion in formulating jury instructions; ho wever it abuses its discretion if the jury instruction s confuse, mislead, or materially misstate the law” (quotations omitted)).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Onyelobi , -43 n.4 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
First, the defendant must make “a prim a facie showing that the State exercised its peremptory challenge against a prospective juror on the basis of race.” State v. Onyelobi, 4 (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Onyelobi , State v. Hysell , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Wilson 900 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2017
State v. Wilson 900 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2017
State v. Harris 895 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 2017
State v. Harris 895 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 2017
See, -44 (Minn. 2016) (concluding that facts were “sufficient to give rise to an honest and strong belief’ that the defendant possessed the narcotics, jointly or singly, “that police saw in her hotel room”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Onyelobi , –43 (Minn. 2016).
State of Minnesota v. Dana John Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Davis Schultz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Dana John Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
4 To preserve an issue for appeal and avoid the plain-error standard, a party must “bring the issue to the attention of the [district] court.” n.16 (Minn. 2016) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Davis Schultz Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Probable cause exists when a person of ordinary care and prudence, viewing the totality of circumstances objectively, would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a specific individual has committed a crime.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Marco Anthony Gresham Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marco Anthony Gresham Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4 A prima facie case of purposeful discrimination is established “by showing: (1) that one or more members of a racial minority has been peremptorily excluded and (2) that circumstances of the case raise an inference that the exclusion was based on race.” (quotations omitted).