Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Clifford G. Menyweather, Relator v. Fedtech, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic …, 872 N.W.2d 543.

27 citing documents.

Tiffany Crossfield, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Dr. Edward Bello, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Corp., Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Robert Salvaggio, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Anne L Doering, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Theresa Stang, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
7 question [of] whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Joshua Winne, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
David Rupprecht, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Lisa Falck, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an 4 applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtec h, Inc.
Samiira Husein, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We review de novo a ULJ’s interpretation of unemployment statutes and “the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Joni T. White, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc., (citing Irvine v. St.
In the Matter of: Julie Heaver. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Timothy J. Rosenberger, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
In the Matter of: Michael Hein. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Michael Olson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
But we apply de novo review “to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an app licant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Terence Taylor, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Barbara Jacobson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
If the relevant facts are not in dispute, this court applies “a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question of whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Soua Vang, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Daniel Carson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Amber McCorison, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Diaz v. Three Rivers Cmty. Action, Inc. 917 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Diaz v. Three Rivers Cmty. Action, Inc. 917 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc. , , 545 (Minn. App. 2015).
Lillian L. Morris, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“If the rele vant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to th e ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Cynthia M. Leisey, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question of whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Dawn Campbell, Relator v. MVP Realty Advisors, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dawn Campbell, Relator v. MVP Realty Advisors, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the 3 ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.