Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Clifford G. Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Developme…, 872 N.W.2d 543.

27 citing documents.

Tiffany Crossfield v. AT&T Services Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Dr. Edward Bello v. University of Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Corp., Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Robert Salvaggio v. Prominent Technology, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Anne L Doering v. 2Care4U South, LLC, 4U Home Health Care South, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Theresa Stang v. Ind. School District #047, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2023
7 question [of] whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Joshua Winne v. J & G Holdings, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
David Rupprecht v. Qwest Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Lisa Falck v. One Call Medical, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an 4 applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtec h, Inc.
Samiira Husein v. University of Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We review de novo a ULJ’s interpretation of unemployment statutes and “the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Joni T. White v. FGX International, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
6 an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc., (citing Irvine v. St.
In the Matter of: Julie Heaver Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Timothy J. Rosenberger v. South-Town, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
In the Matter of: Michael Hein Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Michael Olson v. Schneiderman’s Furniture Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2021
But we apply de novo review “to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an app licant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Terence Taylor v. Northern Tier Retail LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Barbara Jacobson v. County of Dakota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2021
If the relevant facts are not in dispute, this court applies “a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question of whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Soua Vang v. Medtronic Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Daniel Carson v. PACT Charter School, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Amber McCorison v. Pizza Luce III, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Diaz v. Three Rivers Cmty. Action, Inc. 917 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Diaz v. Three Rivers Cmty. Action, Inc. 917 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc. , , 545 (Minn. App. 2015).
Lillian L. Morris v. Unity Health Care, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“If the rele vant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to th e ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Cynthia M. Leisey v. Express Scripts Services Company, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the ultimate question of whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.
Dawn Campbell v. MVP Realty Advisors, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dawn Campbell v. MVP Realty Advisors, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“If the relevant facts are not in dispute, we apply a de novo standard of review to the ULJ’s interpretation of the unemployment statutes and to the 3 ultimate question whether an applicant is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.” Menyweather v. Fedtech, Inc.