Cited by

(neglecting to file briefs); (order) (failing to communicate); –22 (Minn. 2017) (failing to keep client apprised of case status or provide client with important case-related documents); Taplin, d at 312 (failing to attend hearings).

(concluding that we could not consider mitigating factors an attorney might have raised when the attorney never responded to a disciplinary petition).

26 (Minn. 2017) (disbarring an attorney for neglect and abandonment of ten clients).

Finally, while we consult similar cases and attempt to impose consistent discipline, the proper discipline is ultimately determined “based on the unique facts and circumstances of each case.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Additionally, we consult similar cases and attempt to impose consistent discipline, but the proper discipline is ultimately determined “based on the unique facts and circumstances of each case.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

In re 15 Matson, (declining to consider any mitigating circumstances because the attorney did not file an answer to the petition); (“[R]espondent’s failure to answer the petition with any mitigating circumstances bars our consideration of such issues.”).

(declining to consider mitigating factors because the allegations have been deemed admitted.).

But we have also acknowledged that in “a few instances [we have] imposed di scipline less than disbarment in a misappropriation case when the record does not reveal substantial mitigating factors.” d 17, 26 (Minn. 2017).

See In re Matson , , 25 (Minn. 2017) ("Because [the attorney] did not file a response and we have deemed the allegations in the petitions admitted, he may not now raise mitigating factors.").

See In re Matson , , 23 n.2 (Minn. 2017) (declining to apply the reciprocal-discipline standard, even when the Director requested it, because the case involved additional acts of misconduct that were not considered by the other jurisdiction).

(declining to consider any mitigating 7 circumstances because the attorney did not file an answer to the petition).

We recently noted that in “a few instances [we have] imposed discipline less than disbarment in a misappropriation case when the record does not reveal substantial mitigating factors.” -92 (Minn. 2012) (order) (imposing an indefinite suspension for a minimum of.

Misappropriation alone is ‘“particularly serious misconduct and usually warrants disbarment absent clear and convincing evidence of substantial mitigating factors.’ ” ().