Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co., 909 N.W.2d 540.

34 citing documents.

In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Death Benefit for Eric William Groebner (Deceased) Minn. 2026
Co., –44 (Minn. 2018) (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted) (holding “[i]n the context of commencing a civil action, the word ‘delivery’ has a special meaning” and citing Black’s Law Dictionary’s definition to determine the “accepted legal meaning of ‘delivery’ ”).
State of Minnesota, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock, Respondent/Cross-Appellant Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock, Respondent/Cross-Appellant Minn. 2025
Co., (alteration in original) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
J&D Dental, et al., Respondents, vs. Liya Hou, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
J&D Dental, et al., Respondents, vs. Liya Hou, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (quotation omitted).
Steven Craig Redick, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Hiscox Insurance Company, Minn. 2023
Co., (citation omitted).
Lisa Thielen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., d 540 (Minn. 2018)).
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Judicial Branch, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., (“A 1 The record indicates that th e ALPR was operated by Mystic Lake Casino, but that data from the ALPR was shared with the officer upon her request.
A20-1587 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Katelyn Mae Tobias, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Dia Eldin Jubara, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Megan Guetzkow, as mother and natural guardian of E.I., a minor, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co., d 540, 547 (Minn. 2018).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co. , (quotation om itted).
Village Homes of Grandview Square II Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Co. , -47 (Minn. 2018) (concluding that a party’s action commenced upon personal service of process by the sheriff, but that that conclusion “may be cold comfort,” as th e commencement was after the date that the district court determined that the statute of limitations expired).
Minn. 2020
Tammy Kirkpatrick, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
John Schulz, et al., Minn. 2019
Minn. 2019
Co., –45 (Minn. 2018); see also Minn. Stat. § 645.08(1).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
James Briks, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
requires personal delivery.” d 540, 544 (Minn. 2018) .
Bacon v. Bd. of Pensions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Am. 930 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bacon v. Bd. of Pensions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Am. 930 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , , 543 (Minn. 2018).
Nichole Cox, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Abdel Elnashar, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Janet M. Bauch, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Schulz v. Town of Duluth 923 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Schulz v. Town of Duluth 923 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , , 546 (Minn. 2018).
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Co. , , 543 (Minn. 2018) (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Nelson , , 445 (Minn. 2014) (Dietzen, J. dissenting) ).
Paul King, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sela Invs. Ltd. LLP v. H.E. 909 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sela Invs. Ltd. LLP v. H.E. 909 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. , , 544, WL 522831 (Minn. Jan.