Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pearson v. State, 891 N.W.2d 590.

210 citing documents.

Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
See Pearson v. State , , 597 (Minn. 2017) ("[A] postconviction court may summarily deny a claim that is procedurally barred by the Knaffla rule."
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To demonstrate prejudice from defense counsel’s failure to inform her of a plea offer, “a defendant must demonstrate a ‘reasonable probability’ that the defendant ‘would have accepted the plea,’ ‘the plea offer would have been presented to the court,’ ‘the court would have accepted its terms,’ and the sentence ‘under the offer’s terms would have been less severe.’” (quoting Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156, 164, 132 S. Ct. 1376, 1385 (2012)).
Taylor v. State 910 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 2018
Taylor v. State 910 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 2018
See Pearson v. State , , 597 (Minn. 2017) ; see also Minn. Stat. § 590.04 , subd.
Joseph Paul Myers, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when it has exercised its discretion in an arbitrary or capricious manner, based its ruling on an erroneous view of the law, or made clearly erroneous factual findings.” Pearson v. State , (quotation omitted).
Tony Terral Kelly, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Zornes v. State 903 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2017
Zornes v. State 903 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2017
(alterations in original) (quoting Rainer, d at 695 ).
Maksud Ul Mahbub, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“Under the Knaffla rule, once a direct appeal has been taken, .