Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pearson v. State, 891 N.W.2d 590.
-
State v. Mouelle
922 N.W.2d 706
Minn. 2019
Pearson v. State , , 600 (Minn. 2017).
- Charles Winston v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Dominique Salatheia Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State of Minnesota v. Augustine Corona
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “We review the denial of a petition for postconviction relief for an abuse of discretion.”
- Rufus Cornelius Loyd v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
-
Andersen v. State
913 N.W.2d 417
Minn. 2018
See Pearson v. State , , 597 (Minn. 2017) ("[A] postconviction court may summarily deny a claim that is procedurally barred by the Knaffla rule."
-
State of Minnesota v. Rebecca Lavaughn McGowan
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To demonstrate prejudice from defense counsel’s failure to inform her of a plea offer, “a defendant must demonstrate a ‘reasonable probability’ that the defendant ‘would have accepted the plea,’ ‘the plea offer would have been presented to the court,’ ‘the court would have accepted its terms,’ and the sentence ‘under the offer’s terms would have been less severe.’” (quoting Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156, 164, 132 S. Ct. 1376, 1385 (2012)).
- Taylor v. State 910 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 2018
-
Taylor v. State
910 N.W.2d 35
Minn. 2018
See Pearson v. State , , 597 (Minn. 2017) ; see also Minn. Stat. § 590.04 , subd.
-
Joseph Paul Myers v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when it has exercised its discretion in an arbitrary or capricious manner, based its ruling on an erroneous view of the law, or made clearly erroneous factual findings.” Pearson v. State , (quotation omitted).
- Tony Terral Kelly v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Zornes v. State 903 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 2017
-
Zornes v. State
903 N.W.2d 411
Minn. 2017
(alterations in original) (quoting Rainer, d at 695 ).
-
Maksud Ul Mahbub v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“Under the Knaffla rule, once a direct appeal has been taken, .