Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom, 925 N.W.2d 233.

24 citing documents.

Peter Richard Rickmyer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A25-0125 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lorob Properties LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court abuses its discretion when it makes “findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kelly Michels, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
American Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Inc., et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
2 Respondents’ brief to this court states that Yuan “deposited $18,000 with the district court” and “continued operating his clinic.” 7 DECISION “The district court’s decision to invoke its contempt powers is subject to reversal for abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Valentin Arkadievich Povarchuk, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(contempt); -65 (Minn. App. 2000) (conduct-based fees), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: David Gordon Wingad v. Janet Marie Wingad Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: David Gordon Wingad v. Janet Marie Wingad Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kevin James Kleinschmidt v. Angela Rose Farkash Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kevin James Kleinschmidt v. Angela Rose Farkash Minn. Ct. App. 2024
John P. Norusis v. City of Marine on Saint Croix Minn. Ct. App. 2024
John P. Norusis v. City of Marine on Saint Croix Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, by Dr. Brooke Cunningham, Commissioner of Health in her official capacity, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom , (noting that w e review the district court ’s contempt order for an abuse of discretion).
Estate of William L. Pickett, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Michaela Dojcinovic Bachmayer, NKA Michaela Dojcinovic, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Windcliff Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Brad Allen Friesz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom , .
Gloria Fritz, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minnesota Sands, LLC, Minn. 2020
958, 960 (Minn. 1906); (“ ‘For what,’ says Lord Coke .
Calm Waters, LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Lee 929 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2019
State v. Lee 929 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 2019
" Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom , , 238 (Minn. 2019) (quoting In re Comm'r of Pub.
In re the Marriage of: Franklin Olaniyan, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” Sehlstrom v. Sehlstrom , , 1 Appellant also raises a number of other issues in her brief, as she did a t the hearing.