Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Nordstrom, 331 N.W.2d 901.

117 citing documents.

Stewart Edward Underhill, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Underhill cites the supreme court’s and this court’s rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
P. 15.09, and/or a plea petition “signed by the defendant and filed with the court as part of the record ,” State v. Nordstrom , (emphasis added) (citing Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Nordstrom , -05 (Minn. 1983); see also State v. Simon , (rejecting defendant’s collateral attack when his guilty plea was counseled).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Albert Silas Garner, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Albert Silas Garner, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Robert Forster Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Robert Forster Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 901, 905 (Minn. 1983).
State v. Maddox 825 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Maddox 825 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
impossible to determine upon appellate review whether a waiver was knowing and intelligent.” , 904 n. 6 (Minn.1983) (noting that generally “[a] waiver of ...
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
Hayes v. Commissioner of Public Safety 773 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Hayes v. Commissioner of Public Safety 773 N.W.2d 134 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. McFee 721 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 2006
State v. McFee 721 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 2006
where the defendant claimed that he pleaded guilty without the requisite waiver of his right to counsel.
State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
State v. Casarez, 295 Minn. 534, 536 , State v. Moosbrugger, 263 Minn. 56, 61-62
State v. Schmidt 712 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 2006
State v. Schmidt 712 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 2006
State v. Kouba 709 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Kouba 709 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
For example, for purposes of enhanced penalty statutes in regard to sentencing, “[wjhere a defendant is unrepresented and there is no record of waiver of counsel, a prior conviction may be collaterally attacked on constitutional grounds and invalidated in a subsequent proceeding.”
State v. Schuster 709 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Schuster 709 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Bergh, d at 737 ; (holding that a criminal conviction in which defendant was not represented could not be used to enhance subsequent DWI offense if the right to counsel was not properly waived).
Spann v. State 704 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 2005
Spann v. State 704 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 2005
State v. Schmidt 701 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Schmidt 701 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Dumas , in which the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a criminal conviction in which the defendant was not represented by counsel and the right to counsel was not properly waived, could not be used to enhance a subsequent DWI offense.
State v. Bergh 679 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Bergh 679 N.W.2d 734 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Prior to 1998, the seminal case on the use of a prior uncounseled conviction to enhance a
State v. Hawanchak 669 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Hawanchak 669 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. McLellan 655 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. McLellan 655 N.W.2d 669 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(applying Nordstrom to uncounseled Wisconsin guilty plea).
State v. Mellett 642 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Mellett 642 N.W.2d 779 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
prohibits “the use of a prior unconstitutionally obtained conviction to enhance a subsequent charge.” Dumas, d at 302 (second emphasis added).
Vernlund v. State 589 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Vernlund v. State 589 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Dumas 587 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Dumas 587 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety 509 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Davis v. Commissioner of Public Safety 509 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See, (challenging use of prior misdemeanor DWI to convert subsequent DWI into gross misdemeanor DWI).
State v. Fussy 467 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1991
State v. Fussy 467 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1991
McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 460 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Fussy 458 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Fussy 458 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
the supreme court held that a prior conviction may not be admitted in a proceeding which uses the prior conviction as an element of a current charge if the prior conviction is constitutionally invalid.
Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety 455 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1990

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by