Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Spaeth v. City of Plymouth, 344 N.W.2d 815.
-
Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, (rejecting a narrow reading of a statute awarding attorney fees in an eminent domain proceeding because “the purpose of that section is to assure that any landowner who is forced to take legal action against an acquiring authority is made whole”).
- Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, LLC, et al., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
In the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
This rule “is designed to avoid the confusion and waste of time potentially arising from having the same issues before two courts at the same time.” 9 ().
-
PPB Holdings, L.P., Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Cf. Spaeth v. City of Plymouth , -826 (Minn. 1984) (concluding that district court had continuing jurisdiction to determine amount of attorney fees awarded to Spaeth after entry of judgment).
- Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Shane Feldhaus v. City of Minnetonka
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, 822 (Minn. 1984) (determining that a constitutional taking had occurred and therefore that the district court properly issued “a writ of mandamus compelling the City to commence eminent domain proceedings”).
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
David N. Volkmann Constr., - 77 (Minn. App. 1988) ().
-
Joseph Roach, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-25 (Minn. 1984) (holding that attorney fees are collateral); City of Waite Park v. Minn. Off.
-
Mower County Health and Human Services, Petitioner,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
This rule “is designed to avoid the confusion and waste of time potentially arising from having the same issues before two courts at the same time.” Spaeth v. City of Plymouth
-
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc., Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
are independent of the underlying decision and do not seek to modify the underlying decision in any way.” Id.; see Spaeth v. City of Plymouth , (providing that a claim for attorney fees s hould be treated as an issue independent of the merits of the litigation).
-
In re the Marriage of: Susan Lee Wood, petitioner, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
David N. Volkmann Const., Inc. v. Isaacs , –77 (Minn. App. 1988) (citing Spaeth v. City of Plymouth , d 815, 824 (Minn. 1984)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2; see Spaeth v. City of Plymouth
- Eric D. Humphreys, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
A18-0170
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 140, 143 (Minn. App. 2003) (citing Spaeth v. City of Plymouth , ).
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. D. B., Juvenile Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
Timothy Ayman Bakdash, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, -26 (Minn. 1984) (concluding that district court retained jurisdiction over a c laim for attorney and expert fees because such a claim “should be treated as a matter independent of the merits of the litigation”); d 140, 143 (Minn. App. 2003) (concluding that the district court retained j
- Doug Blaine v. City of Sartell, County of Stearns 865 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Doug Blaine v. City of Sartell, County of Stearns
865 N.W.2d 723
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[I]ntermittent flooding may, under some circumstances, constitute a taking.” Nolan & Nolan, d at 492 ().
- Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This argument is unavailing, as caselaw provides that attorney-fee claims are “treated as a matter independent of the merits of the litigation.”
- North Star International Trucks, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc. 837 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- North Star International Trucks, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc. 837 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning Board 811 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 2012
-
DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning Board
811 N.W.2d 610
Minn. 2012
-23 (Minn.1984), noting that a literal reading of section 117.045 “would *613 mean that a landowner could recover costs and expenses when an acquiring authority fails to acquire enough property, but not when it fails to make any provision whatsoever for eminent domain proceedings.” We concluded that section 117.04
- DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning Board 796 N.W.2d 299 Minn. 2011
-
DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning Board
796 N.W.2d 299
Minn. 2011
(holding that McShane does not apply when the government has physically appropriated property); (holding that McShane does not apply when the government commenced condemnation proceedings to acquire land within a runway Zone A rather than ena
- T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC 773 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2009
-
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC
773 N.W.2d 783
Minn. 2009
See, (characterizing motions for attorney fee sanctions and costs and disbursements as collateral to the merits of the underlying litigation); (same).
- City of Waite Park v. Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings 758 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
City of Waite Park v. Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings
758 N.W.2d 347
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
courts have “continuing jurisdiction” to decide the amount of attorney fees, even after an appeal has been taken from a judgment on the merits, although the preferred course is for the district courts “to rule on such claims as soon as possible after entry of judgment on the merits or to not enter judgment on the merits until the fees issue has been finally resolved.” -26 (Minn.1984).
- Marriage of Perry v. Perry 749 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Marriage of Perry v. Perry
749 N.W.2d 399
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
The rule “is designed to avoid the confusion and waste of time potentially arising from having the same issues before two courts at the same time.”
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- In Re Thulin 660 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
In Re Thulin
660 N.W.2d 140
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(quoting State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , ) (concluding that “the jurisdiction of a trial court is suspended only to those matters necessarily involved in the appeal”).
- Kellar v. Von Holtum 605 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2000
-
Kellar v. Von Holtum
605 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 2000
-26 (Minn.1984) (holding claim for attorney and expert fees independent of merits of litigation).
- Kellar v. Von Holtum 583 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Kellar v. Von Holtum
583 N.W.2d 761
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Pending a duly executed appeal, the jurisdiction of a trial court is suspended only to those matters necessarily involved in the appeal, not as to those matters which are independent of, or which are supplemental to, the appeal or collateral to the proceeding in which the appealed order or judgment was rendered.” (quoting State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , ).
- First National Bank of Deerwood v. Gregg 556 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1996
- First National Bank of Deerwood v. Gregg 556 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1996
- Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of Champlin 539 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of Champlin 539 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Zuehlke v. Independent School District No. 316 538 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Zuehlke v. Independent School District No. 316 538 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Wolfson v. City of St. Paul 535 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Wolfson v. City of St. Paul 535 N.W.2d 384 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Johnson v. City of Shorewood 531 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Johnson v. City of Shorewood 531 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1995