C0-94-1580
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Carter v. Cole
Carter v. Cole, 539 N.W.2d 241 (Minn. 1995).
Cited by
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: H.B., Child Minn. 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Matthew Warren Luepke Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Ramey James Olson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- State of Minnesota v. Jeremiah Joel Bauer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota (A18-1999) (A18-1957,) v. Torrance Lee Royster (A18-1957) (A18-1999) Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota (A18-1655) (A18-1490) v. Brian Joseph Andvik (A18-1490) (A18-1655) Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota v. James Ernest Piere Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota v. Cory Clifford Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State v. Jama 908 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota v. Ishmael Roberts 876 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Parnard Smith, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Hebert v. CITY OF FIFTY LAKES 784 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Baker v. Chaplin 517 N.W.2d 911
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, in light of the reasoning of Johnson v. Jones, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2151 , 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995), the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. We do not here consider or determine the appealability of an order denying summary judgment where the genuine issues of material fact identified by the trial court are related to the issue of immunity, and not to the merits of the claim. See Baker v. Chaplin, 517 N.W.2d 911, 916 (Minn.1994).