DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 616 N.W.2d 732.

184 citing documents.

Range Cornice & Roofing Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., (quotation omitted).
Thomas Brule Trucking, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., (quotation omitted).
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, Stieg Strand Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Han Zhong v. Nicholas Dudero, Stieg Strand Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., (quotation omitted).
Kaylen Stiever v. Lake County Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Kaylen Stiever v. Lake County Minn. Ct. App. 2026
John Donahue, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., (quotation omitted).
Rum River Timber Harvesting, Inc. v. Greg Jeddeloh Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Rum River Timber Harvesting, Inc. v. Greg Jeddeloh Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Alex Sajady, et al., Appellants, vs. Tracy Sajady, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Alex Sajady, et al., Appellants, vs. Tracy Sajady, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Doug Hoskin, Appellant, vs. Josh Krsnak, et al., Respondents Minn. 2025
Doug Hoskin, Appellant, vs. Josh Krsnak, et al., Respondents Minn. 2025
A24-1454 A24-1455 A24-1700 A24-1741 A24-1750 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (quotation omitted).
Steven Van Kuyk, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Provision Media, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (“[T]he first element of promissory estoppel .
Lake Minnetonka Real Estate II, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Maria Olson v. City of Cambridge, Jay T. Squires, Lisa Iverson, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Maria Olson v. City of Cambridge, Jay T. Squires, Lisa Iverson, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., d 732, 739 n.7 (Minn. 2000)).
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (describing promissory estoppel as an equitable doctrine that “implies a contract in law where none exists in fact” (quotation omitted)); (“[A]n action for unjust enrichment is not based on the contract, but is a quasi-contractual agreemen
In re the Marriage of: Bette Lou Gubbe Slag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (quotation omitted).
Nanette Brooks, parents and natural guardians of minor A.B. v. Tracy Crudo individually, and as ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Nanette Brooks, parents and natural guardians of minor A.B. v. Tracy Crudo individually, and as ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., (explaining that, in deciding sufficiency of allegations, “it is immaterial whether or not the plaintiff can prove the facts alleged”).
Section 21 Southeast, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Co., -40 (Minn. 2000) (quoting Franklin, d at 29).
Dawn Pieper v. Jacob Thomas Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Dawn Pieper v. Jacob Thomas Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Spring Grove Township, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., ; see also Meriwether Minn. Land & Timber, , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
James R. Martin, Patrick S. Martin v. Mid-America Festivals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2023
James R. Martin, Patrick S. Martin v. Mid-America Festivals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Edgard Mariano, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co. , (holding that where the district court granted a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on the merits, the “complaint should be dismissed with prejudice”).
Dynamic Energy Solutions, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., -40 (Minn. 2000) (quoting Franklin, d at 29).
Jonathan G. Foss, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
James R. Pavelka, Jr., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., (quotation omitted).
S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Susanne Auleciems, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The Townhomes of Raspberry Ridge Homeowners Association, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co ., ; (“The Minnesota Supreme Court has identifie d three prongs of the doctrine: promise, reliance and injustice.”) .
Ronald A. Hagle, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Dr. Eric Ringsred, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Martin Matthew Lange, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Shanon Renee Harper, DNP, NP, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Louis Reis, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
RSS Fridley, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Odyssey Medica_l Technologies, LLC, Appellant, vs. Medtronic, Inc., Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Minnesota Bank & Trust, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
BDS Laundry Management Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Raymond L. Semler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Klingelhutz Judgment, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. , d 732, 739 n.7 (Minn. 2000).
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, et al., Minn. 2021
Minn. 2021
Co., ( stating that de novo review is appropriate when we consider whether a party’s alleged statements constitute a unilateral offer to contract).