Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Baird, 654 N.W.2d 105.

170 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. David Lee Kingbird Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- 51 (Minn. App. 2013) (applying plain-error review when a party objected to a jury instruction at trial but challenged the instruction for a different reason on appeal), aff’d on other grounds
State of Minnesota v. Jamaal Terrance Tanna Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. James Robert Hess Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[A]n appellate court will not consider an alleged error in jury instructions unless the instructions have been objected to at trial.”
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. 2024
15 d at 402–03, —affect our analysis.
State of Minnesota v. Cory Gene Dustan Lutz Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Christian Portillo, A21-1621, Supreme Court, December 13, 2023 Minn. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Christian Portillo, A21-1621, Supreme Court, December 13, 2023 Minn. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
the district court erroneously instructed the jury that the defendant had a duty to “retreat or avoid the danger if reasonably possible” when acting in self-defense in his own home.
Minn. 2023
In this case, the jury instructions did not affect Lampkin’s substantial rights because the evidence does not demonstrate a “reasonable likelihood that a properly instructed jury could have accepted [Lampkin’s] claim of self-defense.”
State of Minnesota v. Joshua William Dwyer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Angela Marie Vela Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Vela argues that her case 10 is like State v. Baird
Jesse Lee Helget (A20-1036) v. Commissioner of Public Safety, State of Minnesota, vs. Jesse Lee Helget (A22-0103) Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Martha Sisay Abara Minn. Ct. App. 2022
District courts are given “considerable latitude” in selecting language for the jury instructions, but the instructions “may not materially misstate the law.”
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-14 (Minn. 2002) (affirming an order for a new trial based on an erroneous duty-to-retreat instruction); see also State v. Koppi , (granting a new trial based on an objected-to instructional error where the error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt).
State of Minnesota v. Jordyn Lynn Hjeldness Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Joseph Z. Livingston v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Anthony Cruz Hernandez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 105, 113 (Minn. 2002) ; State v. Ihle
State of Minnesota v. James Obonyo Onuko Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Adam Vance Stevenson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
District courts are given “consid erable latitude” in selecting jury instruction language, and we ordinarily review for abuse of that discretion, d 675, 682 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Arthur Barron Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jaycob Peter Hoffman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Eli Jovanny Masani Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Tory Larae Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Under this test, the challenging party must show: 1) error, 2) that is plain, and 3) that affects substantial rights.”
State of Minnesota v. Eugene Foster Cole Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Lavell Ross Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Timothy James Niedermayer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Sh aka 927 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Sh aka 927 N.W.2d 762 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Baird , , 113 (Minn. 2002).
State of Minnesota v. LC Monroe Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Steven James Hayes v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“Fairness [under the plain-error standard] requires that [the defendant] be given an opportunity to present his account of the facts to a jury under the proper instructions.”) Allowing Hayes’s second-degree-assault conviction to stand, whe n the jury was directed to find an element of the offen
State of Minnesota v. William Aaron Wozna, III Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Valerian Jacobson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Lloyd Dale Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Baird , d 105, 113 (Minn. 2002).
State v. Jama 908 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Jama 908 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Baird , , 113 (Minn. 2002).
State of Minnesota v. Jesus Octavio Peralta Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Joseph Hodapp Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Otis Rodney Elder, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“[C]ourts are vested with discretion in managing trials.”); 14 (providing discretion to district courts in selecting jury instructions).
State of Minnesota v. Brian William Meger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brian William Meger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Demetreus Anthony McGinnis Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Demetreus Anthony McGinnis Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Manuel Demmings Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Manuel Demmings Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christian Mccary Mayo Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christian Mccary Mayo Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-14 (Minn. 2002) (affirming an order for a new trial based on an unobjected-to, erroneous duty-to-retreat instruction under the plain-error test).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Myhre 875 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Myhre 875 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 2016